joecrisp
01-14-2005, 06:37 PM
Thanks for the kind words guys.
As for Arrington's grievance, I've always been confused. I have him down for a $4.5M bonus in 2006. Never been sure if Lavar expects an extra $2M to make it $6M, or a full extra $6M to make it $10M.
Based on all the other Redskins contracts, a $10M roster bonus is definitely out of the ordinary and doesn't make sense.
I have nothing against Lavar. I just hope this thing gets settled so he can get back to the business on the field.
The way LaVar explained it to me, he thought he had agreed to an additional $6M in 2006. That would bring the total bonuses in 2006 to $10M. I asked him why the Redskins would agree to an additional roster bonus in 2006, on top of what already appeared to be a generous bonus for that year, and he said it was all there on the contract. I'm not sure that either of us understood each other when I asked him about it, though. There were some semantic differences in the way I posed the question regarding "roster" bonuses, and his response, which indicated "signing" bonuses. I should have pressed him about it, but frankly, I was a little shocked that he would discuss it with me at all, and I didn't want to press my luck.
As for Arrington's grievance, I've always been confused. I have him down for a $4.5M bonus in 2006. Never been sure if Lavar expects an extra $2M to make it $6M, or a full extra $6M to make it $10M.
Based on all the other Redskins contracts, a $10M roster bonus is definitely out of the ordinary and doesn't make sense.
I have nothing against Lavar. I just hope this thing gets settled so he can get back to the business on the field.
The way LaVar explained it to me, he thought he had agreed to an additional $6M in 2006. That would bring the total bonuses in 2006 to $10M. I asked him why the Redskins would agree to an additional roster bonus in 2006, on top of what already appeared to be a generous bonus for that year, and he said it was all there on the contract. I'm not sure that either of us understood each other when I asked him about it, though. There were some semantic differences in the way I posed the question regarding "roster" bonuses, and his response, which indicated "signing" bonuses. I should have pressed him about it, but frankly, I was a little shocked that he would discuss it with me at all, and I didn't want to press my luck.