cpayne5
01-13-2005, 12:07 PM
You can't compare Detmer and Feeley money to Arrington money. You want to use PHI as an example? Look what happened to Trotter before we signed him. It happens to the 'best' of them.
He was comparing (detmer & feeley vs McNabb) to (clemons & marshall vs Arrington, like you did in post #1).
What about Trotter before we got him???
FRPLG
01-13-2005, 12:09 PM
I am growing extremely tired of this crap...
In an effort to not be a jerk about this I will not use names but it is seriously time for some people around here to face the fact that they know nothing about football. Or at least don't have a firm grasp of the way the NFL works. On top of the fact that you don't trade an all pro line backer for apparently no good reason you also don't trade an all pro linebacker when it would KILL YOUR FREAKING CAP!!!. It would not save us any money at all next year. Listen up people...this team is built for next year. Next year is it. Talent wise next year will be our best year we've had in awhile and may be short lived since 2006 may require some serious rework for cap reasons. We are not trading Portis or Lavar or anybody outside of the obvious candidates...plain and simple it is not going to happen. ANd any 'journalist' who suggests otherwise clearly is making things up just for the heck of it...those tards over at Comcats must not understand the NFL as much as they would have you believe.
BossHog
01-13-2005, 12:16 PM
That's my point as well. Who would rather have? A high-priced, brand-name guy who plays well or a budget-priced, no-name guy who plays just as well? Let's not kid ourselves. Yes, Arrington wrecks havoc. He has also blown more assignments than M street hooker. :oink:
cpayne5
01-13-2005, 12:18 PM
That's my point as well. Who would rather have? A high-priced, brand-name guy who plays well or a budget-priced, no-name guy who plays just as well? Let's not kid ourselves. Yes, Arrington wrecks havoc. He has also blown more assignments than M street hooker. :oink:
So you would rather have Feeley & Detmer over McNabb?
Redskins_P
01-13-2005, 12:22 PM
I am growing extremely tired of this crap...
In an effort to not be a jerk about this I will not use names but it is seriously time for some people around here to face the fact that they know nothing about football. Or at least don't have a firm grasp of the way the NFL works. On top of the fact that you don't trade an all pro line backer for apparently no good reason you also don't trade an all pro linebacker when it would KILL YOUR FREAKING CAP!!!. It would not save us any money at all next year. Listen up people...this team is built for next year. Next year is it. Talent wise next year will be our best year we've had in awhile and may be short lived since 2006 may require some serious rework for cap reasons. We are not trading Portis or Lavar or anybody outside of the obvious candidates...plain and simple it is not going to happen. ANd any 'journalist' who suggests otherwise clearly is making things up just for the heck of it...those tards over at Comcats must not understand the NFL as much as they would have you believe.
:iamwithst
BossHog
01-13-2005, 12:24 PM
I am growing extremely tired of this crap...
In an effort to not be a jerk about this I will not use names but it is seriously time for some people around here to face the fact that they know nothing about football. Or at least don't have a firm grasp of the way the NFL works. On top of the fact that you don't trade an all pro line backer for apparently no good reason you also don't trade an all pro linebacker when it would KILL YOUR FREAKING CAP!!!. It would not save us any money at all next year. Listen up people...this team is built for next year. Next year is it. Talent wise next year will be our best year we've had in awhile and may be short lived since 2006 may require some serious rework for cap reasons. We are not trading Portis or Lavar or anybody outside of the obvious candidates...plain and simple it is not going to happen. ANd any 'journalist' who suggests otherwise clearly is making things up just for the heck of it...those tards over at Comcats must not understand the NFL as much as they would have you believe.
You're barking up the right tree Mr. Cap Expert. So you're saying Lavar Arrington will be a Redskin for the duration of his 8 year extension? Just as Stephen Davis played out his 10 year 100 million dollar contract(How much we 'Skins fans loved Stephen Davis)? Maybe that's the problem with our front office. We bite off other teams' trade bait and lose valuable trade picks and never come up with our own. And lose stars like Smoot and Davis to free agency.
BossHog
01-13-2005, 12:27 PM
So you would rather have Feeley & Detmer over McNabb?
Hold this sign for me... :iamwithst
You're comparing apples to oranges. :oink:
cpayne5
01-13-2005, 12:32 PM
Hold this sign for me...
You're comparing apples to oranges.
That's my point as well. Who would rather have? A high-priced, brand-name guy who plays well or a budget-priced, no-name guy who plays just as well? Let's not kid ourselves. Yes, Arrington wrecks havoc. He has also blown more assignments than M street hooker. :oink:
My God, man, do you not understand what you wrote?!
Or are you trying write such conflicting posts just to get us to pull our hair out?
BossHog
01-13-2005, 12:33 PM
I'm not at all interested or concered about what PHI does! Who would you rather have Brunell or Ramsey and Hasselbeck? :oink:
cpayne5
01-13-2005, 12:36 PM
You can't compare Detmer and Feeley money to Arrington money. You want to use PHI as an example? Look what happened to Trotter before we signed him. It happens to the 'best' of them. :oink:
Look it all stems from that comment.
It seemed as though you didn't understand Gman's post. I tried to clear it up for you. How we got here, I do not know. You tell me.