2012 QB Class

I rather see us go for Tannhill or Barkely. Isn't the Wisconsin QB a senior? I like RGIII, but I want to see him play the bigger boys before I want him on the Skins. Outside of Oklahoma, OSU, and Tex A&M, the Big 12 sucks as bad as the Big Ten this season. To be honest from what I have witnessed, I rather get the kid from Wisconsin over RGIII.

Russell Wilson, 5th year senior and transfer from NC State. From my hometown of Richmond. Went to Collegiate (a private school). ESPN had a really good show about him. He is playing really well for the Badgers this year.

http://i51.tinypic.com/19qsjt.png

ESPN's 'Depth Chart' offers inside look at Russell Wilson, Wisconsin (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2011/10/russell-wilson-wisconsin-espn-depth-chart/1)

I'm all for getting 2 QBs in next year's draft.

We had a few of those guys come in a few months ago and they ran some drills. If the game was all about passing drills, I'd probably take Nick Foles 10 out of 10 times. But when he's in an actual game, I'm just not overly impressed.
Foles looks good tonight vs UCLA. AZ 42 - UCLA 7 @ the half !

Foles looks good tonight vs UCLA. AZ 42 - UCLA 7 @ the half !

It's settled then Foles and Moore 2012!!

Seriously though, I'll have to go back and watch tonight's game. But like I said he came to campus with Matt Barkley, and-jeez I'm drawing a blank on the other guys-I want to say Ryan Lindley and some other dude. Anyhow, Foles showed the strongest, most accurate arm of the three. Easily

Nick foles

It's settled then Foles and Moore 2012!!

Seriously though, I'll have to go back and watch tonight's game. But like I said he came to campus with Matt Barkley, and-jeez I'm drawing a blank on the other guys-I want to say Ryan Lindley and some other dude. Anyhow, Foles showed the strongest, most accurate arm of the three. Easily
At this time , things look good for the Skins , as the QB class has a number of possible NFL starting qb's . If we take a qb in rd 1 or 2 , and Moore does fall into rd 4 , I would like us to take him also , hard to see him lasting that long .

I think part of the reason foles isn't getting much respect from the scouts (or hype I should say) is because he plays on a bad team, whose a bottom dweller in their conference, much like Jake Locker with washington (the only difference is that Locker was hyped up whereas Foles isn't because of Luck and Barkley)

Foles looks good tonight vs UCLA. AZ 42 - UCLA 7 @ the half !

Side note on that game...wow Rick Neuheisel not really doing a great job at UCLA. Kinda thought he get them back on track by now.

Top prospects IMO:

1. Luck
2. Barkley
3. Foles
4. Jones
5. RG3
6. Moore
7. Cousins
8. Tannehill

First 5 listed are very legit 1st round talent.

Haven't watched any OK football, but has Landry Jones regressed? I thought most analysts considered him just behind Luck.

There's alot of football left to be played this year. My guess is we'll draft in the 13-17 range. If so, we could potentially move up to a top 5 or 6 and the cost wouldn't kill us. It helps that the worst teams don't need qb's.

Indi, Car, St Louis don't need a qb but each could and might take Luck. I don't think Carolina would but Indi and St Louis might.

Haven't watched any OK football, but has Landry Jones regressed? I thought most analysts considered him just behind Luck.

There's alot of football left to be played this year. My guess is we'll draft in the 13-17 range. If so, we could potentially move up to a top 5 or 6 and the cost wouldn't kill us. It helps that the worst teams don't need qb's.

Indi, Car, St Louis don't need a qb but each could and might take Luck. I don't think Carolina would but Indi and St Louis might.

Not in my eyes. I think Landry Jones would look good in burgundy and gold. His numbers so far this year:
rating 156.0
comp pct 67.6
yards 2177
ypa 8.6
TD 16
INT 6