Carson Palmer to Oakland Raiders for 1st/2012

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Ruhskins
10-18-2011, 01:58 PM
He's 32 in two months, Oakland made a bad deal IMO

It's super risky no doubt.

Bucket
10-18-2011, 02:02 PM
Man.. If they gave up two 1sts for Carson Palmer, we should of made a move and traded them Rex Grossman. We could of at least got a 4th.

Ruhskins
10-18-2011, 02:04 PM
Man.. If they gave up two 1sts for Carson Palmer, we should of made a move and traded them Rex Grossman. We could of at least got a 4th.

To the Raiders defense, the Seymour trade worked out okay...probably not first-round okay, but it wasn't a disaster. Meanwhile, the Pats D was never the same after Seymour left, although their potent offense has been able to overcome any defensive deficiencies.

skinsfaninok
10-18-2011, 02:05 PM
Seymour is a DT that can be productive longer than other positions, Palmer is a OLD QB that is always hurt, If I'm a Raiders fan I'm not that stoked like some have been acting like. I think all of us Skins fans can see whats going to happen in Oakland (McNabb trade for us).. I just don't see it working out

GTripp0012
10-18-2011, 02:10 PM
Man.. If they gave up two 1sts for Carson Palmer, we should of made a move and traded them Rex Grossman. We could of at least got a 4th.They already had Kyle Boller.

12thMan
10-18-2011, 02:19 PM
Seymour is a DT that can be productive longer than other positions, Palmer is a OLD QB that is always hurt, If I'm a Raiders fan I'm not that stoked like some have been acting like. I think all of us Skins fans can see whats going to happen in Oakland (McNabb trade for us).. I just don't see it working out

Palmer is only 31..that's not old in QB years. He probably has 3 or 4 left in the tank if he can stay upright.

Ruhskins
10-18-2011, 02:23 PM
Seymour is a DT that can be productive longer than other positions, Palmer is a OLD QB that is always hurt, If I'm a Raiders fan I'm not that stoked like some have been acting like. I think all of us Skins fans can see whats going to happen in Oakland (McNabb trade for us).. I just don't see it working out

Somewhat similar, but not completely the same. Don't get me wrong, I don't think this is the best deal out there, I just don't think it is the worst (yet). When McNabb came to us, we had no receivers, a terrible line, and we were implementing a 3-4 defense with 4-3 personnel. I think this has a better chance to work out than McNabb. If it fails though, the consequences are going to be bigger than us, because basically you setback a team that has some good components already in place.

GTripp0012
10-18-2011, 02:26 PM
And Palmer was a much better player at his peak than McNabb was. That's a big one when evaluating the relative compensation.

Meks
10-18-2011, 02:27 PM
welp, another bonehead trade by Oakland ... less they win the sb next few years, which they wont.. this is useless

Meks
10-18-2011, 02:31 PM
And Palmer was a much better player at his peak than McNabb was. That's a big one when evaluating the relative compensation.

maybe u wanna retract this.one...
cuz.Carson didn't do shit for cincy in the post season really... he also did it with two great recievers .. mcnabb had what.. t.o for 3/4 a year? ... they don't compare at their peaks at all IMO ... and I hate the mcscabb

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum