|
JoeRedskin 02-15-2012, 03:05 PM No response for any of you?...lol I thought as much. Nothing to say when you know good and god damn well our country is at fault for all of this and will continue to make things worse by meddling in the Middle East.
Yup. We intervened in a short sighted manner to protect our interests and it bit us in the ass and continues to do so.
"At fault for all of this"? I guess we have to disagree on that one. A few other actors have intervened in the Middle East since 1979. But, it's a simplistic assertion that has an element of truth - your favorite.
We "will make things worse by meddling in the Middle East"? Again, I ask you ... do we remove our military and aid from the Middle East? What do you think the consequences would be to the US economy if we did so? What should our ME policy be?
And to be clear, yes ... much of ME policy is driven by oil. It's called dependency and, if you have a realistic plan to make the stability of the ME unimportant to the US, I am all ears. I suggest, if the Straits of Hormuz are closed (as Iran has threatened on occasion) or if Iran attempts to intervene in Iraq after we have gone (to protect the Shia minority or oppose the secular govt. existing).
NC_Skins 02-15-2012, 03:05 PM So its all about Palestine now??????
This thread has more curves in it than a slinky.
No, you keep talking about the threat of Iran to Israel, and I'm showing you the true threat of Israel to the Arab nation. The Hamas and Palestine region are backed by Iran and Syria. Iraq was the middle man in all of this.
Iran having a nuke is no more of a threat than Israel having one.
You keep talking about deflecting but yet you deflect over and over and over. You have shown absolutely nothing of substance. Nothing.
Alvin Walton 02-15-2012, 03:15 PM No, you keep talking about the threat of Iran to Israel, and I'm showing you the true threat of Israel to the Arab nation. The Hamas and Palestine region are backed by Iran and Syria. Iraq was the middle man in all of this.
Iran having a nuke is no more of a threat than Israel having one.
You keep talking about deflecting but yet you deflect over and over and over. You have shown absolutely nothing of substance. Nothing.
Wow.....could you get any loonier?
RedskinRat 02-15-2012, 03:17 PM There was no point to invade Iraq but we did.
U.N. Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms
There was no point for military actions in Lybia but we did.
U.N. Resolution 2009 outlined support for building a Democracy in Lybia
Blah, blah, blah...Iran
U.N. News: The issue has been of international concern since the discovery in 2003 that Iran had concealed its nuclear activities for 18 years in breach of its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
What does Iraq, Iran, and Lybia all have in common?
They fit your narrative?
Greatest Oil Reserves by Country, 2006 — Infoplease.com (http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0872964.html)
All three countries are in the top 10 in oil reserves. This is no coincidence.
Yeah, it is.
Tell me, why are<n't> we talking about air strikes to North Korea?
China
How come we aren't steam rolling the warlords in South Africa? Resources. That's why. Everything in life comes back to two things. Money and Power.
I hope you're not suggesting South Africa had no resources.......:laughing2
firstdown 02-15-2012, 03:20 PM I didn't say we were stealing the oil or that it would be free.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/13/world/middleeast/iraq-criticizes-exxonmobil-on-kurdistan-oil-pursuits.html
Nah, it wasn't about oil.
http://www.yellowdoggereldemocrat.org/images/oil_price_rise.gif
Oh, you say it's about fanatics with nukes eh? Much like Saddam Hussein?..lol Didn't we hear this same shit back in 2002?
KMKkQx_dTC4
Number of countries Iran has bombed in the past decade- 0
Number of countries the US has bombed in the past decade- 8
Yemen 2002
Iraq 1991-2003 (US/UK on regular basis)
Iraq 2003-present
Afghanistan 2001-present
Pakistan 2007-present
Somalia 2007-8, 2011
Yemen 2009, 2011
Libya 2011
Who's the fanatics with nukes again? I'm confused. :doh:
Dude you might want to think about moving.
RedskinRat 02-15-2012, 03:22 PM LOL. Coming from you, that's rich. You haven't shown shit, but spouted talking points from dumbasses on the TV and main stream media. You keep talking about Iran and how they are "talking" about wiping the Israelis out and I show you that's exactly what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians. BUT....that's deflection?...lololol
...but yeah, this map doesn't mean squat. They aren't systematically wiping out the Arabs and going against a UN resolution.
http://www.thehypertexts.com/images/israel-palestine_map.jpg
Israel became a nation in 1312 B.C., two thousand years before the rise of Islam.
Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of Israel. Up until 1968, the Jews who lived in Israel - and before that British Palestine - did not refer to themselves as 'Israelis'. They called themselves 'Palestinian Jews'.
Palestinians........trick, please!
JoeRedskin 02-15-2012, 03:25 PM LOL. Coming from you, that's rich. You haven't shown shit, but spouted talking points from dumbasses on the TV and main stream media. You keep talking about Iran and how they are "talking" about wiping the Israelis out and I show you that's exactly what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians. BUT....that's deflection?...lololol
...but yeah, this map doesn't mean squat. They aren't systematically wiping out the Arabs and going against a UN resolution.
Didn't realize there were Israeli "death camps" so that they could "systematically wip[e] out the Arabs". Pretty shoddy language given the issues at hand. The map simply shows land acquired. In fact, the muslim population of Israel has grown since 1995 both in raw numbers and as a percentage of the whole (14% in '95, 22% in 08). Statistical Abstract of Israel 2009 - No. 60 Subject 2 - Table No. 2 (http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/shnaton/templ_shnaton_e.html?num_tab=st02_02&CYear=2009)
The Israelis are by no means pure as snow guys and our alliance with them is driven by a number of factors both internal to our national politics and by our desire for a stable govt. ally with in the ME (Say what you want about their politics but, since their establishment in '47, when was the last time Israel had a "regime change" such as has occurred in the various Arab nations in the region).
Israel has not abided by the UN declaration and should do so. At the same time, other than Egypt & Jordan every other Arab nation in the Mid-East is in a state of either declared or undeclared war with Israel. Given that, and though I don't agree whole heartedly with it, I can see their side of the story.
And all of this is relevant to the potential destabilizing effect to the region caused by Iran's potential possesion of nuclear weapns how?
RedskinRat 02-15-2012, 03:35 PM Iran having a nuke is no more of a threat than Israel having one.
Then why does Ahmadinejad make so many less-than-veiled threats regarding the obliteration of Israel in his speeches?
This should concern anyone in conjunction with a nuclear armed Iran.
Israel is the only thriving Democracy in a cesspool of theocracies.
Ruhskins 02-15-2012, 03:37 PM Israel became a nation in 1312 B.C., two thousand years before the rise of Islam.
Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of Israel. Up until 1968, the Jews who lived in Israel - and before that British Palestine - did not refer to themselves as 'Israelis'. They called themselves 'Palestinian Jews'.
Palestinians........trick, please!
Weren't these Arabs living in Palestine/Israel before 1967? During the Ottoman Empire in the 16th and 17th century, there was a small Jewish population living in the area known today as Israel. But there was a much sizable population of Muslims living in that area.
If I am not mistaken, I believe a lot of these native Palestinian Jews lived somewhat peacefully along with the majority Muslim population. It was the immigration of European Jews and the Zionist movement that propelled the conflict between these two groups, along with the growing Muslim nationalist movement of the early 1900s.
JoeRedskin 02-15-2012, 03:38 PM No, you keep talking about the threat of Iran to Israel, and I'm showing you the true threat of Israel to the Arab nation. The Hamas and Palestine region are backed by Iran and Syria. Iraq was the middle man in all of this.
Which Arab nation? You do realize there are several?
Iran, of course, is not one of them.
|