'Occupy' types

No response for any of you?...lol I thought as much. Nothing to say when you know good and god damn well our country is at fault for all of this and will continue to make things worse by meddling in the Middle East.

A. He sounds like an egghead that made a living out of scaring treehuggers.
B. He's dead.

I figure I wouldn't even have to bother citing who was for military action or bombing Iran since you GOPers should know your own party. Which candidate? All of them save Ron Paul.

You were saying? Nah, he's not pumping fear into the mass public. Nope.
» Gingrich: Iran Nuke Attack on U.S. “Real Danger” Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! (http://www.infowars.com/gingrich-iran-nuke-attack-on-u-s-real-danger/)




Would President Romney Bomb Iran? - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/president-romney-bomb-iran/story?id=15290441#1)

Gingrich


Huntsman


Perry


Romney.


Santorum



Nah, nobody's been talking about bombing Iran. Not even as far back as 2007.
Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-zoPgv_nYg)




This shit wreaks of how Iraq war started. They pump the fear up into people about WMD (or nukes), and then they come out and say LOOK WE HAVE PROOF OF WMD.....which they invade only to find out nothing is there. Trillions of dollars later, and countless people are dead, nobody is held accountable.

Iran trumpets nuclear advances, deepening standoff with West - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/iran-trumpets-atom-advances-deepening-standoff-west-121448512.html)


^^the drum beats of war. If you can hear them, then you aren't listening to the mainstream media much.

You're missing the part where the Iranian govt announces every other month that they want to wipe Israel off the map.
While they go about enriching uranium.

And you havent answered Joes question about an invasion.

Who are we invading?
Who are we bombing without justification?

Report: Iran nuclear scientist killed in car bomb blast - CNN (http://articles.cnn.com/2012-01-11/middleeast/world_asia_iran-scientist-killed_1_iranian-nuclear-scientists-natanz-isfahan?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST)


I find it ironic that we do the exact same thing that we condemn them for. Target innocent civilians and assassinations.

A scientist is a civilian no matter how much you want to paint him as the bad guy.


Explain to me why Iran shouldn't have a nuclear weapon? Israel has one and they've committed more atrocities over the course of the past decades than Iran has. Let's tally up how many innocent lives they've slaughtered in the Gaza strip trying to take over land.

Pakistan has a nuclear weapon, and they outright support terrorist so why aren't we bombing them? In fact, we were giving them billions of dollars. So how many nuclear weapons have the terrorists acquired from them? None. So what makes you think Iran is any less unstable than Pakistan?

There was no point to invade Iraq but we did.
There was no point for military actions in Lybia but we did.


What does Iraq, Iran, and Lybia all have in common?


Greatest Oil Reserves by Country, 2006 — Infoplease.com (http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0872964.html)

All three countries are in the top 10 in oil reserves. This is no coincidence. Tell me, why are we talking about air strikes to North Korea? How come we aren't steam rolling the warlords in South Africa? Resources. That's why. Everything in life comes back to two things. Money and Power.

:laughing2

Here we go with the age old liberal mantra of "No blood for oil".
And still we didnt get any oil......pffffftttt
Iran isnt about oil.
Its about fanatics with nukes.
Its about an eight year old wildly swinging a bayonet in a crowded room.

Report: Iran nuclear scientist killed in car bomb blast - CNN (http://articles.cnn.com/2012-01-11/middleeast/world_asia_iran-scientist-killed_1_iranian-nuclear-scientists-natanz-isfahan?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST)


I find it ironic that we do the exact same thing that we condemn them for. Target innocent civilians and assassinations.

A scientist is a civilian no matter how much you want to paint him as the bad guy.


Explain to me why Iran shouldn't have a nuclear weapon? Israel has one and they've committed more atrocities over the course of the past decades than Iran has. Let's tally up how many innocent lives they've slaughtered in the Gaza strip trying to take over land.

Pakistan has a nuclear weapon, and they outright support terrorist so why aren't we bombing them? In fact, we were giving them billions of dollars. So how many nuclear weapons have the terrorists acquired from them? None. So what makes you think Iran is any less unstable than Pakistan?

Really trying hard not to laugh here.....

A. He sounds like an egghead that made a living out of scaring treehuggers.
B. He's dead.

Great educated retort there. I look forward to seeing more pictures of dolls in the freezer in the near future. I'll get to replying to the other stuff when I get time.

http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f237/redstout/moonbat.png

Report: Iran nuclear scientist killed in car bomb blast - CNN (http://articles.cnn.com/2012-01-11/middleeast/world_asia_iran-scientist-killed_1_iranian-nuclear-scientists-natanz-isfahan?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST)


I find it ironic that we do the exact same thing that we condemn them for. Target innocent civilians and assassinations.

A scientist is a civilian no matter how much you want to paint him as the bad guy.


Explain to me why Iran shouldn't have a nuclear weapon? Israel has one and they've committed more atrocities over the course of the past decades than Iran has. Let's tally up how many innocent lives they've slaughtered in the Gaza strip trying to take over land.

Pakistan has a nuclear weapon, and they outright support terrorist so why aren't we bombing them? In fact, we were giving them billions of dollars. So how many nuclear weapons have the terrorists acquired from them? None. So what makes you think Iran is any less unstable than Pakistan?

Are you not assuming that we did that? Where are your facts? Is there anything the US does right in your eyes?

:laughing2

Here we go with the age old liberal mantra of "No blood for oil".
And still we didnt get any oil......pffffftttt
Iran isnt about oil.
Its about fanatics with nukes.
Its about an eight year old wildly swinging a bayonet in a crowded room.

No, we didn't get any oil from Iraq.

But Halliburton did get some lucrative oil production service deals which were unavailable before.

Report: Iran nuclear scientist killed in car bomb blast - CNN (http://articles.cnn.com/2012-01-11/middleeast/world_asia_iran-scientist-killed_1_iranian-nuclear-scientists-natanz-isfahan?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST)

I find it ironic that we do the exact same thing that we condemn them for. Target innocent civilians and assassinations.

A scientist is a civilian no matter how much you want to paint him as the bad guy.

Explain to me why Iran shouldn't have a nuclear weapon? Israel has one and they've committed more atrocities over the course of the past decades than Iran has. Let's tally up how many innocent lives they've slaughtered in the Gaza strip trying to take over land.

Pakistan has a nuclear weapon, and they outright support terrorist so why aren't we bombing them? In fact, we were giving them billions of dollars. So how many nuclear weapons have the terrorists acquired from them? None. So what makes you think Iran is any less unstable than Pakistan?

Call me stupid, but I don't think Israel or Pakistan would willingly give terrorist nuclear weapons. Trust me, I think our alliance with Israel is one of the reasons we are targets of terrorism. However, I am not going to naively believe that Iran wouldn't use their nukes in the Middle East or even on us.