CrazyCanuck
01-06-2005, 05:03 PM
Muhammed has already said he's looking for a lucrative deal, I wouldn't want to dish out very much for a WR over 30.
Agreed. We don't need him.
Agreed. We don't need him.
McCants thinks he's goneCrazyCanuck 01-06-2005, 05:03 PM Muhammed has already said he's looking for a lucrative deal, I wouldn't want to dish out very much for a WR over 30. Agreed. We don't need him. skinsguy 01-06-2005, 06:48 PM Muhammed has already said he's looking for a lucrative deal, I wouldn't want to dish out very much for a WR over 30. We need a good bargain veteran. offiss 01-06-2005, 06:49 PM I think Gardner will be gone before McCant's, he has more value right now [which isn't saying much] McCant's may have more of an opportunity once that happen's, I don't see Thrash as more than a 4th and sometimes a 3rd reciever, if Jacob's can step up and be a #2 than that would slot Thrash at 3 but I do believe we need a physical reciever at the #1 or 2 slot who can take the ball away from the defender's, Muhammad is exactly that, but I agree with the rest I wouldn't give him the megabuck's contract to get him. Beemnseven 01-06-2005, 11:20 PM The thing I don't understand is why Rod Gardner got a free pass to start every week when there were plenty of uninspired performances, dropped balls, and one-catch or non-factor games. Why didn't any other receiver get a chance to start and get extended playing time if Gardner was in a slump? Essentially, McCants will be shown the door for doing in practice what Rod Gardner did for much of the season during actual games. What proof do we have, by the way, that McCants was actually slacking off during practice? I mean, that seems to be the general consensus at the Warpath. But does anybody really have evidence to back up this claim? Were there actual reports from newspapers that I missed? They know better about McCants than me, but Man, I sure hope he doesn't turn out to be another Frank Wycheck. offiss 01-07-2005, 02:48 AM The thing I don't understand is why Rod Gardner got a free pass to start every week when there were plenty of uninspired performances, dropped balls, and one-catch or non-factor games. Why didn't any other receiver get a chance to start and get extended playing time if Gardner was in a slump? Essentially, McCants will be shown the door for doing in practice what Rod Gardner did for much of the season during actual games. What proof do we have, by the way, that McCants was actually slacking off during practice? I mean, that seems to be the general consensus at the Warpath. But does anybody really have evidence to back up this claim? Were there actual reports from newspapers that I missed? They know better about McCants than me, but Man, I sure hope he doesn't turn out to be another Frank Wycheck. I agree Beem's Excellent point! |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum