RedskinRat
05-14-2013, 04:01 PM
Guantanamo: Force Feeding (http://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2013/05/201358152317954140.html)
What happened to us being better than them? Isn't that the lie we were force-fed before the first immaculation of The One? I'm not a fan of al Qaeda, but I won't want to my Government doing this either.
No it was paid in the middle of the day. I pulled prior receipts and they do process them the following day. I just never really looked because I always paid them early. My problem is that its their process and it was paid on the due date. I should not be hit with a penality because they process payments the following day. The rude service I have received from the people working at the IRS is something I have also never experienced in the past.
They should probably cut you a break, but at the same time if they are up front about the fact payments are processed the following day you're kinda SOL.
Daseal
05-14-2013, 04:19 PM
They should probably cut you a break, but at the same time if they are up front about the fact payments are processed the following day you're kinda SOL.
Yeah, it's rough on that front. I still don't understand why banks can't do instant transactions at this point in life. I learned the hard way paying a bill the day it was due, but it took 3 days to 'process' and I got hit with a late fee because of it.
Yeah, it's rough on that front. I still don't understand why banks can't do instant transactions at this point in life. I learned the hard way paying a bill the day it was due, but it took 3 days to 'process' and I got hit with a late fee because of it.
Just the way the ACH works I guess.
Automated Clearing House - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_Clearing_House#ACH_process)
RedskinRat
05-14-2013, 04:47 PM
I still don't understand why banks can't do instant transactions at this point in life.
More money for them, why change a thing?
NC_Skins
05-14-2013, 05:24 PM
So you talked to them today? Did the person on the phone even act like they wanted to help or did they give tyou the tough shit answer?
Yes, I spoke to them on the phone today. Tough shit is about appropriate. She was polite, but acted like she couldn't do anything. Now whether it's because she didn't have the power to is one thing.....or maybe she didn't feel like doing jack shit. Either way, the IRS are a bunch of crooks.
firstdown
05-16-2013, 04:32 PM
Yes, I spoke to them on the phone today. Tough shit is about appropriate. She was polite, but acted like she couldn't do anything. Now whether it's because she didn't have the power to is one thing.....or maybe she didn't feel like doing jack shit. Either way, the IRS are a bunch of crooks.
You should ask for a supervisor and tell them you want to appeal.
CRedskinsRule
06-03-2013, 10:32 AM
How does this not violate the 5th amendment?
Breaking Politics @breakingpol 19m
US Supreme Court justices rule police can take DNA samples from people charged but not convicted of crimes - @Reuters
Retweeted by Breaking News
Expand
JoeRedskin
06-03-2013, 12:50 PM
Because the 5th Amendment only protects you from being forced to give incriminating testimony. You cannot be forced to answer questions.
Your DNA, however, is governed by search and seizure protections of the 4th Amendment. (Search & Seizure).
Not commenting on the validity of the division. Just saying how it is/has been viewed by the SC.
SmootSmack
06-03-2013, 01:24 PM
Wait, why is this thread back on the main page?