Sheriff Gonna Getcha
01-05-2005, 03:48 AM
An Open Passing Attack Produced Results
In the Sunday night game between Philadelphia and Washington, ESPN announcer Joe Theisman said that Gibbs could not effectively run an offense comprised of a running game and very short passes. Like many of us Warpathers, Theisman observed that Gibbs was running an offense that was too predictable, didn't spread out opposing defenses, and stifled the running game by drawing 8 or 9 defenders into the box.
Like Theisman, Doc Walker, creator of the "Fun Bunch" and famed member of the Hogs, knows a thing or two about Gibbs and his offense. Anyone who listens to the John Thompson show on 980 AM knows that Doc Walker has been confused, frustrated, and disappointed by the Redskins offensive (pun intended) performance this season.
However, after last Sunday's game against the Vikings, Doc Walker said that for the first time this season, Gibbs had finally "opened the passing game up." Instead of throwing hitches, short curls, and screens, Gibbs called plays in which receivers ran routes than regularly took them well beyond the sticks.
Many analysts and commentators, like Theisman and Walker, have argued that because Gibbs doesn't fully trust Ramsey yet, pass protection isn't solid, pass accuracy has been suspect, and the Redskins' wideouts' have been unable to consistently haul in deep balls, Gibbs has run a "vanilla" offense. Maybe Gibbs didn't want to open the offense up until Week 17, when the Redskins were eliminated from playoff contention.
I certainly agree with all of the foregoing. That said, it is about time that Gibbs finally began attacking opposing secondaries. Our offense was so totally inept this season that something drastic needed to be changed.
I don't buy Gibbs' statement that he's been trying to develop a deep passing game throughout this season. He alleges that 25% of offensive formations involved at least 3 wide receiver sets. That may be true, but that doesn't in and of itself demonstrate a commitment to develop a deep passing game.
I had excellent Loge seats at the Vikings game and I thought the pass protection was decent, wideouts were consistently getting excellent separation from defenders, and Gibbs NEVER called in so many formations involving multiple wideouts in a single game this season. True, Gibbs ran a lot of his traditional formations involving 2 or 3 tight ends, but he must have had at least 3 wideouts on the field on over 50% of the plays.
I argue that as a result of "opening up the playbook," our offense looked fairly sharp, our running game improved, and we were able to actually score more than 20 points. Although our offense's performance in one game hardly constitutes sufficient ground to convincingly argue that had Gibbs employed a more open offense all season our team would be in the playoffs, that single game was the only game all season in which the Skins' mounted a solid passing attack.
It is also true that Minnesota's defense is God awful, but so were many of the offenses we faced earlier in the season. San Francisco's defense is ranked 19th in the league, Detroit's is ranked 20th, Dallas' is ranked 21st, and Green Bay's is ranked 25th. I think in each of those games we could have opened the passing game up more.
Don't mistake my call for a more open passing game as a cry for a Spurrier-esque offense - it is not. I like Gibbs' offensive philosphy - control the ball, control the clock, run-first, pass deep, and rely on the defense and special teams to seal a victory. I would like to see our offense run the ball more often than it passes it. I would like to see two and three tight end formations. BUT, I would also like to see a LOT more 3 and 4 wide receiver sets as well.
Ramsey's Improvement
In his 7 starts this season, Ramsey had a QB rating of 82.6 and had he played an additional 9 games, was on pace for 3,001 yards, 18 touchdowns, 14 interceptions, and a completion percentage of exactly 65%. While not Pro-Bowl statistics, they are very solid. Ramsey struggled at times against Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but given those teams defenses, his lack of production is forgivable. Encouragingly, against the New York Giants, San Francisco, and Minnesota defenses, Ramsey's quarterback rating was 139.2, 103, and 100.8 respectively.
Despite Ramsey's poor play in his relief performances against the New York Giants and Cincinnati Bengals, I am strongly convinced that Ramsey can be an efficient, smart, and very effective quarterback that Gibbs' needs and Redskins fans have so sorely missed. Give him time (something he wasn't given under Spurrier and has yet to be given under Gibbs) and protection (something he was never given under Spurrier) and he'll become a franchise quarterback.
Given the team's successful use of a deep passing attack against Minnesota and Ramsey's improvement, I think it's about time that Gibbs shows us an offense that we all know he is capable of producing.
In the Sunday night game between Philadelphia and Washington, ESPN announcer Joe Theisman said that Gibbs could not effectively run an offense comprised of a running game and very short passes. Like many of us Warpathers, Theisman observed that Gibbs was running an offense that was too predictable, didn't spread out opposing defenses, and stifled the running game by drawing 8 or 9 defenders into the box.
Like Theisman, Doc Walker, creator of the "Fun Bunch" and famed member of the Hogs, knows a thing or two about Gibbs and his offense. Anyone who listens to the John Thompson show on 980 AM knows that Doc Walker has been confused, frustrated, and disappointed by the Redskins offensive (pun intended) performance this season.
However, after last Sunday's game against the Vikings, Doc Walker said that for the first time this season, Gibbs had finally "opened the passing game up." Instead of throwing hitches, short curls, and screens, Gibbs called plays in which receivers ran routes than regularly took them well beyond the sticks.
Many analysts and commentators, like Theisman and Walker, have argued that because Gibbs doesn't fully trust Ramsey yet, pass protection isn't solid, pass accuracy has been suspect, and the Redskins' wideouts' have been unable to consistently haul in deep balls, Gibbs has run a "vanilla" offense. Maybe Gibbs didn't want to open the offense up until Week 17, when the Redskins were eliminated from playoff contention.
I certainly agree with all of the foregoing. That said, it is about time that Gibbs finally began attacking opposing secondaries. Our offense was so totally inept this season that something drastic needed to be changed.
I don't buy Gibbs' statement that he's been trying to develop a deep passing game throughout this season. He alleges that 25% of offensive formations involved at least 3 wide receiver sets. That may be true, but that doesn't in and of itself demonstrate a commitment to develop a deep passing game.
I had excellent Loge seats at the Vikings game and I thought the pass protection was decent, wideouts were consistently getting excellent separation from defenders, and Gibbs NEVER called in so many formations involving multiple wideouts in a single game this season. True, Gibbs ran a lot of his traditional formations involving 2 or 3 tight ends, but he must have had at least 3 wideouts on the field on over 50% of the plays.
I argue that as a result of "opening up the playbook," our offense looked fairly sharp, our running game improved, and we were able to actually score more than 20 points. Although our offense's performance in one game hardly constitutes sufficient ground to convincingly argue that had Gibbs employed a more open offense all season our team would be in the playoffs, that single game was the only game all season in which the Skins' mounted a solid passing attack.
It is also true that Minnesota's defense is God awful, but so were many of the offenses we faced earlier in the season. San Francisco's defense is ranked 19th in the league, Detroit's is ranked 20th, Dallas' is ranked 21st, and Green Bay's is ranked 25th. I think in each of those games we could have opened the passing game up more.
Don't mistake my call for a more open passing game as a cry for a Spurrier-esque offense - it is not. I like Gibbs' offensive philosphy - control the ball, control the clock, run-first, pass deep, and rely on the defense and special teams to seal a victory. I would like to see our offense run the ball more often than it passes it. I would like to see two and three tight end formations. BUT, I would also like to see a LOT more 3 and 4 wide receiver sets as well.
Ramsey's Improvement
In his 7 starts this season, Ramsey had a QB rating of 82.6 and had he played an additional 9 games, was on pace for 3,001 yards, 18 touchdowns, 14 interceptions, and a completion percentage of exactly 65%. While not Pro-Bowl statistics, they are very solid. Ramsey struggled at times against Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but given those teams defenses, his lack of production is forgivable. Encouragingly, against the New York Giants, San Francisco, and Minnesota defenses, Ramsey's quarterback rating was 139.2, 103, and 100.8 respectively.
Despite Ramsey's poor play in his relief performances against the New York Giants and Cincinnati Bengals, I am strongly convinced that Ramsey can be an efficient, smart, and very effective quarterback that Gibbs' needs and Redskins fans have so sorely missed. Give him time (something he wasn't given under Spurrier and has yet to be given under Gibbs) and protection (something he was never given under Spurrier) and he'll become a franchise quarterback.
Given the team's successful use of a deep passing attack against Minnesota and Ramsey's improvement, I think it's about time that Gibbs shows us an offense that we all know he is capable of producing.