NC_Skins
09-09-2011, 10:49 AM
This thread is getting to be pointless. Haters are gonna hate no matter what reasoned argument is offered.
..and kool aid drinkers are going to drink kool aid no matter what reasoned argument is offered. I claimed that LL is exactly like Roy Williams. Nobody has countered or proved that statement false yet.
Roy Williams, SS at NFL.com (http://www.nfl.com/player/roywilliams/2505013/profile)
20 Ints for the career.
If me comparing Roy Williams to LL is hating, then call me a hater. It just doesn't suit well for them because they want to be able to call Roy Williams bad and terrible in pass defense, yet make the proclamation that LL is much better in coverage than RW. The reality of it is that they both mirror each other in skill set. Hard hitting safeties that were aggressive towards the ball, that lack the discipline to cover their pass responsibilities.
K, I'm done with this. Group hug! :grouphug:
NC_Skins
09-09-2011, 10:50 AM
Your arguments are cherry picked. That is neither logical nor realistic.
How so? My argument is he's another Roy Williams. How is that cherry picked?
..and kool aid drinkers are going to drink kool aid no matter what reasoned argument is offered. I claimed that LL is exactly like Roy Williams. Nobody has countered or proved that statement false yet.
Roy Williams, SS at NFL.com (http://www.nfl.com/player/roywilliams/2505013/profile)
20 Ints for the career.
If me comparing Roy Williams to LL is hating, then call me a hater. It just doesn't suit well for them because they want to be able to call Roy Williams bad and terrible in pass defense, yet make the proclamation that LL is much better in coverage than RW. The reality of it is that they both mirror each other in skill set. Hard hitting safeties that were aggressive towards the ball, that lack the discipline to cover their pass responsibilities.
K, I'm done with this. Group hug! :grouphug:
lol and you haven't really done anything to prove your point either
hilarious
polywog
09-09-2011, 10:55 AM
K, I'm done with this. Group hug! :grouphug:
I'm NOT done....only because it's a slow day at The Warpath. This is the only thread with any fire in the furnace.
Thanks for the hug, but I'm not much of a huger....affection makes me feel kind of weird. :cheeky-sm
:)
I'm done, not going to get sucked into this vortex any further
http://www.bleachernation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gary-bussey-is-crazy.jpg
Oh and don't interpret this picture. Whatever you think my message is here, is wrong.
NC_Skins
09-09-2011, 11:08 AM
lol and you haven't really done anything to prove your point either
hilarious
..and you haven't proved yours either. Guess we are in the same sinking boat and have reached a stalemate.
SS HILARIOUS going down!! Man the life boats!
hooskins
09-09-2011, 11:17 AM
Bottom line is when LL is lined up with a decent coverage safety, the defense is better. Dhall, my oh so favorite CB is great when you have a good coverage CB like Los on the other side, so that a safety can zone to Dhall's side.
Bottom line is when LL is lined up with a decent coverage safety, the defense is better. Dhall, my oh so favorite CB is great when you have a good coverage CB like Los on the other side, so that a safety can zone to Dhall's side.
Agree.
Who feels better lining up with Doughty over Landry?
Any takers?
wilsowilso
09-09-2011, 11:44 AM
LL is a beast in the box.
I think everyone can agree with that.
..and you haven't proved yours either. Guess we are in the same sinking boat and have reached a stalemate.
SS HILARIOUS going down!! Man the life boats!
at least we agree on something, or did I misread you again? ;)
So if you had to make a choice, RW in his prime or LL? Who are you taking?