jbcjr14
09-07-2011, 09:33 AM
I think the rankings for week 1 are just about right for the Redskins. We were 6-10 and the preseason doesn't mean a damn thing. Time to prove it when things matter and then the respect will come.
Skins ranked 25th in Foxsports.com 1st season power rankingsjbcjr14 09-07-2011, 09:33 AM I think the rankings for week 1 are just about right for the Redskins. We were 6-10 and the preseason doesn't mean a damn thing. Time to prove it when things matter and then the respect will come. hooskins 09-07-2011, 09:41 AM But looking at it logically, 6-10 last year with improvements in almost all positions does not amount to a ranking in the mid to high 20's. Do I lose sleep over it? Of course not. But if I were to make an unbiased ranking the Skins surely do not fall that low. rbanerjee23 09-07-2011, 09:55 AM Dude, it's the anti-redskins, hatting media -- who cares Lotus 09-07-2011, 10:24 AM But looking at it logically, 6-10 last year with improvements in almost all positions does not amount to a ranking in the mid to high 20's. Do I lose sleep over it? Of course not. But if I were to make an unbiased ranking the Skins surely do not fall that low. Most national media people don't do enough homework to recognize that fact. SkinzSince80 09-07-2011, 10:27 AM I think the Skins have the least amount of coverage of any team in the NFL. I don't know why people hate/dismiss them so much. I used to think it was because they haven't played well in so long....but neither have a lot of teams. Anyone have any idea? mooby 09-07-2011, 10:28 AM But looking at it logically, 6-10 last year with improvements in almost all positions does not amount to a ranking in the mid to high 20's. Do I lose sleep over it? Of course not. But if I were to make an unbiased ranking the Skins surely do not fall that low. From the media's perspective, it's like this. We didn't go out and sign any big names this offseason, so how do they know we got better? In fact, by signing a bunch of marginal role players and drafting for a lot of positions that aren't quarterback, which was the main hole on the team, it's a sign that we've gotten worse. And that's why: DoWtHqmITOM SmootSmack 09-07-2011, 11:11 AM Most national media people don't do enough homework to recognize that fact. We don't know for sure that we've made improvements. We made changes, but not necessarily improvements. We'd like to think they did. But the only way to know for sure is on the field celts32 09-07-2011, 11:16 AM You have to earn your media love. I don't know why so many people are interested in the media telling us how great we are before we have proven anything. The Redskins are a historic franchise with a lot of fans...if they start to win consistently the media love will come in buckets. JoeRedskin 09-07-2011, 11:31 AM What have we done to deserve any media attention other than have a QB battle between two guys who excite no one outside of Redskins Nation? Sure the drama is gone, but we have done nothing to generate a positive buzz? We are a 6-10 team with no QB until we prove otherwise. Until we prove otherwise, it should be expected for us to be ranked in the bottom third of the league. Its those media idiots who have us ranked as one of the 3 worst teams or getting only 3 wins that deserve to be treated with contempt b/c those media guys have clearly done no research (comparing strength of schedule, looking at roster changes, factoring in 2nd year of players in system, etc.). But you know what? I don't care where they rank us. I just care what the final score is. JoeRedskin 09-07-2011, 11:31 AM We don't know for sure that we've made improvements. We made changes, but not necessarily improvements. We'd like to think they did. But the only way to know for sure is on the field Bingo. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum