mooby
08-26-2011, 07:02 PM
I cant even be 100% sure as to what he means by all that drivel, how did you decipher it?
What's to decipher? He just wrote that last sentence as a means to insert Grossman into a completely unrelated conversation. It doesn't matter whether it makes sense or not. He may be a troll, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't entertained.
Kindoy
08-27-2011, 04:20 AM
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Stallworth
Austin
Hankerson
All of these guys have to be on the team.
stallworth definitely does not have to be on the team
Kindoy
08-27-2011, 04:30 AM
Banks lost value but he still has SOME value. Like Smooty said, Paul doesn't have any value as a 6th (inactive) receiver. I think we all can agree that Banks can make plays in the open field, so it's on the coaches to get him the ball in the open field. Banks will hopefully get to return a couple kicks a game, not to mention punts and it's not about scoring every time but rather field position...
hooskins
08-27-2011, 10:15 AM
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hank
PS- Paul
IR - Banks
This seems to be common consensus amongst my buds. Not starting order persay.
12thMan
08-27-2011, 11:14 AM
So weird how last season we're pulling our hair out over Joey Galloway and Devin Thomas, now it seems like we have a promising WR corps. What a difference a year makes.
SkinzWin
08-27-2011, 11:29 AM
So weird how last season we're pulling our hair out over Joey Galloway and Devin Thomas, now it seems like we have a promising WR corps. What a difference a year makes.
That's what happens when you replace father time and a pompous d-bag with promising rookies and proven veterans.