ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]

skinsfaninok
06-21-2011, 12:26 AM
The skins are a bottom feeder team and have been for years. I hate to say it but it's true folks. Yeah we have made the playoffs a couple times in the DS era but honestly it's been a nightmare as a skins fan.

saden1
06-21-2011, 12:38 AM
Seriously. I don't think many people are jealous of our franchises value. The only people that might be jealous are small market teams looking at how much the Skins can spend on signing bonus's and coaches, but when they look at our record and how much fans have to pay to attend games any sense of jealously probably goes away.

The only time I've enjoyed the net value thing is when my friends thought I was crazy for saying that the Redskins were among the 5 most valuable sport franchises world wide, and way even be in the top 2, to which they replied that there was NO WAY the Skins were more valuable then teams like Real, Barca, Chelsea, Bayren, Arsenel. As well as teams like the Yankees, Lakers, Red Sox, Patriots, etc.

It was pretty shocking to considering that teams like Real Madrid had paid 100 million Euros just to acquire the rights to a player. Never mind paying them to play, just the right to sign them to a contract.

A hollow victory if there ever was one.

Last I checked Real Madrid was one of the worst managed team in sports. I think they were 300 million dollars in dept and nearly went bankrupt. Their management makes Danny look timid.

tc2deuce
06-21-2011, 10:00 AM
And that's one of the problems. So valuable monetarily, yet so unsuccessful on the field relative to our worth

I agree 100 percent! That just shows you what kind of fan base the Skins have.

NYCskinfan82
06-21-2011, 07:33 PM
IT IS WHAT IT IS...........: Mark May Isn't a Fan of an Ex-Redskin GM's Evaluation Skills (http://walkingdeadmanblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/mark-may-isnt-fan-of-ex-redskin-gms.html#more)

This is the main reason we were ranked so low.

NC_Skins
06-22-2011, 07:06 PM
I hear that NC_Skins contributed a lot to this piece, hence the low rankings. LOL. (I kid, I kid).

o.0




I feel the Redskins are pretty bad (even though we are headed in the right direction), but I think the Bengals and Raiders are much worse off than we are. No way those teams should be ranked above us. Some other teams I feel should be below us.

Pittsburgh Pirates
Kansas City Royals
Milwaukee Brewers
LA Clippers
NY Mets
NY Knicks

Longtimefan
06-22-2011, 11:04 PM
I have been a diehard skins fan since I was 6 years old. I'm 24 now and I'm still waiting for a consistent team to come back. So yeah we are in the bottom in the NFL it's just a fact


Even more troubling, perhaps, was the result of the ESPN fan survey, asking fans to rate on a scale of 1-5 how their commitment to their favorite team had changed in recent years. The Redskins finished tied with the Kings for 116th in that category. Amazing!!

Dirtbag59
06-22-2011, 11:07 PM
Last I checked Real Madrid was one of the worst managed team in sports. I think they were 300 million dollars in dept and nearly went bankrupt. Their management makes Danny look timid.

Your the worst managed team in sports.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum