saden1
05-26-2011, 03:34 PM
So what if it does?
It would be wise to look at reducing the impact of green house gases as scientists have advocated. I mean, we are spending billions in more recovery money every year only to have to do it again the next year. It's time to try something new.
Ruhskins
05-26-2011, 03:53 PM
Thread fail.
The reason Obama does not care is because this is middle Americia, white, and vote Republican.
Spelling fail.
firstdown
05-26-2011, 04:01 PM
Thread fail.
Spelling fail.
LOL. Typing fail.
firstdown
05-26-2011, 04:06 PM
The reason Obama does not care is because this is middle America, white, and vote Republican.
Guy's I was joking about this. We all know its because he is muslim and hates all Amercans.
Ruhskins
05-26-2011, 04:13 PM
LOL. Typing fail.
LOL.
Your "Americia" reminded me of Nelson Muntz' "Go back to Germania" quote from the Simpsons.
Slingin Sammy 33
05-26-2011, 04:15 PM
It would be wise to look at reducing the impact green house gases as scientists have advocated. I mean, we are spending billions in more recovery money every year only to have to do it again the next year. It's time to try something new.It is wise to look, but there is no link, the spike in tornados is a natural occurence and linked to normal atmospheric change (La Nina) in the equatorial Pacific (last link is very good):
No Link Between Tornadoes And Climate Change: US (http://thegwpf.org/science-news/3066-no-link-between-tornadoes-and-climate-change-us.html)
No link between tornadoes and climate change: US (http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-05-link-tornadoes-climate.html)
The Tornado – Pacific Decadal Oscillation Connection « Roy Spencer, Ph. D. (http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/05/the-tornado-pacific-decadal-oscillation-connection/)
TheMalcolmConnection
05-26-2011, 04:26 PM
:doh:
Sooooooooooo much hate from both sides, we heard all the same crap from Democrats when George Bush was in office and now we get to hear it all from Republicans now that Obama is in office. This is what drives me nuts about politics.
Alvin Walton
05-26-2011, 04:40 PM
It would be wise to look at reducing the impact of green house gases as scientists have advocated. I mean, we are spending billions in more recovery money every year only to have to do it again the next year. It's time to try something new.
Or you could take the approach that its natural pattern shifts and these "scientists" cant prove anything.
Funny that there were no gas emissions when the Great Lakes lost their glaciers.....
saden1
05-26-2011, 05:19 PM
It is wise to look, but there is no link, the spike in tornados is a natural occurence and linked to normal atmospheric change (La Nina) in the equatorial Pacific (last link is very good):
No Link Between Tornadoes And Climate Change: US (http://thegwpf.org/science-news/3066-no-link-between-tornadoes-and-climate-change-us.html)
No link between tornadoes and climate change: US (http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-05-link-tornadoes-climate.html)
The Tornado – Pacific Decadal Oscillation Connection « Roy Spencer, Ph. D. (http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/05/the-tornado-pacific-decadal-oscillation-connection/)
Instead, the reasons for the spiking death tolls are more likely due to the rise in the number of mobile homes and the chance paths taken by a series of tornadoes that have happened to target populated areas.
This is awful. Notice the not so subtle fallacious deflections? The question isn't about why people are dying (we know they are dying because their homes got ****ed up along with them) but why are there so many tornadoes. The amount of dancing by the author without addressing the substance of the issue is astounding.
Time will tell if "this year is an extraordinary outlier." Oh wait, NASA said it would only get worse in 2007.
NASA - NASA Study Predicts More Severe Storms With Global Warming (http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2007/moist_convection.html)
Pubs.GISS: Del Genio et al. 2007: Will moist convection be stronger in a warmer climate? (http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abstracts/2007/DelGenio_etal_2.html)
firstdown
05-26-2011, 05:40 PM
This is awful. Notice the not so subtle fallacious deflections? The question isn't about why people are dying (we know they are dying because their homes got ****ed up along with them) but why are there so many tornadoes. The amount of dancing by the author without addressing the substance of the issue is astounding.
Time will tell if "this year is an extraordinary outlier." Oh wait, NASA said it would only get worse in 2007.
NASA - NASA Study Predicts More Severe Storms With Global Warming (http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2007/moist_convection.html)
Pubs.GISS: Del Genio et al. 2007: Will moist convection be stronger in a warmer climate? (http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abstracts/2007/DelGenio_etal_2.html)
They also predicted more hurricans but that has not happened. You cannot pick and choose the facts and when that stops I'll listen.
TCFAQ E11) How many tropical cyclones have there been each year in the Atlantic basin? What years were the greatest and fewest seen? (http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/E11.html)