NC_Skins
04-27-2011, 08:07 PM
I just don't see it a SmokeScreen, the skins know they need a QB and apparently they love BG
They are still saying it's not a smokescreen, but that nothing is set in stone. Things are always changing in the NFL, and deals are always broken off before they ever mature. What is accurate now, may be obsolete by tomorrow. I think if FA gets into the Draft mix, you'll see a lot more stuff going on.
I hope that somebody saves us from making a mistake, much like Cincinnati did when they didn't take our trade offer of a 1st and 3rd(which potential to be another 1st) for Chad Johnson. /facepalm ....or the Chicago/Briggs trade.
SmootSmack
04-27-2011, 08:15 PM
I'd rather trade down to anywhere from 17-24 and take Dalton while picking up an extra pick, but what do I know?
The Dalton indoctrination is a slow but subtle process. You see him and you're like "Ginger QB OMGWTF." The next week you're like "wow he's pretty accurate." Then before you know it you want to take Dalton in the first. I've been indoctrinated. Theres no turning back now.
Try as I might, I just can't get excited about Dalton (that will change of course if we draft him).
I want Locker or to a lesser extent Ponder. I'm sure Gabbert is fine too...but he's no Chase Daniel!!!
skinsfaninok
04-27-2011, 08:16 PM
Mayock has us taking Prince? No way
SBXVII
04-27-2011, 08:17 PM
They are still saying it's not a smokescreen, but that nothing is set in stone. Things are always changing in the NFL, and deals are always broken off before they ever mature. What is accurate now, may be obsolete by tomorrow. I think if FA gets into the Draft mix, you'll see a lot more stuff going on.
I hope that somebody saves us from making a mistake, much like Cincinnati did when they didn't take our trade offer of a 1st and 3rd(which potential to be another 1st) for Chad Johnson. /facepalm ....or the Chicago/Briggs trade.
I still wouldn't mind having CJ but not for probably what Cinci wants. T.O. is expected to be released and probably available even though people don't want him. He's not like his younger self but Moss could stay the #1 and T.O. could be moved to slot/possession receiver. Unless we find a gem in the draft.
what other WR's will be FA's? only asking because I'd prefer to stay away from T.O. but if there is none available we might have to think of him or maybe Randy Moss.
SmootSmack
04-27-2011, 08:23 PM
Sidney Rice, Mike Sims-Walker but let's save the FA Wide Receiver talk for another thread on another day
Dirtbag59
04-27-2011, 08:27 PM
Sidney Rice, Mike Sims-Walker but let's save the FA Wide Receiver talk for another thread on another day
Well thanks to thread deregulation we can start threads on anything. Enjoy as I post a picture of our lead Moderator. MattyK
http://www.classroomhelp.com/lessons/Presidents/presimages/Regan.jpg
SBXVII
04-27-2011, 08:37 PM
Well thanks to thread deregulation we can start threads on anything. Enjoy as I post a picture of our lead Moderator. MattyK
http://www.classroomhelp.com/lessons/Presidents/presimages/Regan.jpg
Oh.... great.... more trickle down threads.
CapitalPunishment
04-27-2011, 09:14 PM
If Mike trades up and snags him, I really believe I will have lost any hope of him bringing change into our organization. It will indicate that he either has no spine and does whatever Dan tells him to do, or that he only won two Superbowls because of the team he inherited, NOT because of what he brought to the team.
Lotus
04-27-2011, 09:24 PM
Oh.... great.... more trickle down threads.
Well played sir.
Dirtbag59
04-27-2011, 09:25 PM
Well played sir.
Lol, I now feel like an idiot for not getting that one or not getting it right away.