Monkeydad
04-27-2011, 01:41 PM
You know, I think this dog made the right choice. If we're taking a WR at #10, I'd want it to be Julio Jones. If Gabbert falls that far, we should take him.
http://footballbrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BlaineGabbert.jpg
can you post a bigger picture?
Alvin Walton
04-27-2011, 01:58 PM
Edit...
Nevermind I just watched that stoopid video.
redsk1
04-27-2011, 03:39 PM
We can post new threads! Yea! Check if already posted. Checked! This can't be posted already, it's all in my mind!
If the following Draft Day Trade offer was made, would you take it for the #10 spot in the first round? Keep in mind without a new CBA, and with the current Lock-Out, or strike, or whatever you call it, we can only trade picks! Not Live current players! If not this offer, suggest a better one! I don't think the Patriots give up #17, but that is just me.
Round 1, #28, Round 2, #33, and Round 3, #74 from the Patriots.
I think that would make alot of sense. We'd have the 28th pick, two early 2nds and a 3rd. What's not to like about that?
redsk1
04-27-2011, 03:49 PM
We might then end of w/ some combination of Ponder, Mark Ingram/Ryan Williams Vt, Phil Taylor and a 3rd to fill in. I could live w/ that for just the first 3 rounds.
I'm the guy that was sure Brady Quinn would be good though.
Monkeydad
04-27-2011, 05:01 PM
can you post a bigger picture?
Sure, I could.
SBXVII
04-27-2011, 09:34 PM
can you post a bigger picture?
Yeah. lol. My computer scrolled down fine until I reached the picture..... then it acted like the 6 million dollar computer...... s l o w m o t i o n. Then sped back up. lol.
SkinsCM
04-28-2011, 12:44 PM
Here's a rather unusual scenario that seems plausible (to me at least): The Eagles are in desperate need of someone to play opposite Asante Samuel and we desperately need to trade down to fill as many holes as possible (I really don't think there is any upside to taking a QB at #10 given our other problems and we can't trade up w/o additional picks). Maybe the Eagles are actually our best trade down fit?
If Amukamara is still around at #10 (I'm assuming Peterson is long gone) this would be an appealing scenario for the Eagles. Many pundits talk about them trading with the Vikings and picking at #12 but what are the chances that one of the two CBs they'd be interested in are around after Houston at #11 which has a similar need?
Shanahan was willing to deal with them last season and the Eagles made out very well in the end so why not again? I think the Eagles would see Amukamara as a good value at #10 and we'd get the additional 2nd rd (#55) pick we need + something more. Adversity might make for strange bedfellows...
Ruhskins
04-28-2011, 01:52 PM
Here's a rather unusual scenario that seems plausible (to me at least): The Eagles are in desperate need of someone to play opposite Asante Samuel and we desperately need to trade down to fill as many holes as possible (I really don't think there is any upside to taking a QB at #10 given our other problems and we can't trade up w/o additional picks). Maybe the Eagles are actually our best trade down fit?
If Amukamara is still around at #10 (I'm assuming Peterson is long gone) this would be an appealing scenario for the Eagles. Many pundits talk about them trading with the Vikings and picking at #12 but what are the chances that one of the two CBs they'd be interested in are around after Houston at #11 which has a similar need?
Shanahan was willing to deal with them last season and the Eagles made out very well in the end so why not again? I think the Eagles would see Amukamara as a good value at #10 and we'd get the additional 2nd rd (#55) pick we need + something more. Adversity might make for strange bedfellows...
Interesting speculation, although I'd hate to give the Eagles the opportunity to add a playmaker in the defense to kill our average'ish wide receiver group.