Paintrain
04-25-2011, 07:35 PM
I'd be ok with Mallett, Ponder or Locker (in that order) in the 2nd round, but I think we are picking Locker at 10 and that scares the hell outta me.
Would you be ok with...Paintrain 04-25-2011, 07:35 PM I'd be ok with Mallett, Ponder or Locker (in that order) in the 2nd round, but I think we are picking Locker at 10 and that scares the hell outta me. Terpfan76 04-25-2011, 07:46 PM If we are going to reach for a qb at either 10 - Locker or 14 - Ponder/Dalton (if we trade back), I'd be much more comfortable reaching for Locker at 10. I just can't possibly see Ponder or Dalton being worth the 14th pick if that is what is being suggested. No way, no how. Swarley 04-25-2011, 08:04 PM Over the last 20 years how many seasons has this team had outstanding QB play from start to finish? I can think of two seasons...Brad Johnson 1999 and Mark Rypien 1992. It's time to get a potentially great qb who can wins games.... and the only way to do that is to suck really bad in 2011 to have a chance to draft Luck in 2012. you don't need the first overall pick in order to get a potentially great QB. Just look at the great QB of the League in the last decade and tell me who was a 1st overall pick. Landry44 04-25-2011, 08:31 PM Mallett won't last until 41, as for the 10th pick I want a QB. The NFL has changed , this isn't always draft OL or DL anymore. QB is more important now than ever especially with the latest rule changes, the redskins havnt had a young QB of the future in decades So yes we need to take one now I couldn't agree with you more. As far as Mallett he definitely has a top 10 arm and I would take him at ten. GTripp0012 04-25-2011, 08:37 PM It would be bad if we didn't spend any of our picks on a quarterback. It's just not good to have no QBs under the age of 29 on your roster. Had pretty much that same problem last year. Worst thing that you can do in a non-competitive year is having no one (at all) to play. How many times would the Cowboys have been to the playoffs since 2005 if they had Drew Bledsoe and Chad Hutchinson on their 2006 roster instead of Bledsoe and Romo? Never, maybe? I'm okay with passing on all QBs in the draft and paying out a decent sized UDFA contract to a guy like Jerrod Johnson, but I'm not cool with just going into the season with Grossman and Beck alone. Landry44 04-25-2011, 08:52 PM 4. Wait for one of the projects to fall in Kaepernick or Mallet at 41 or hope that Ponder experiences a Colt McCoy like dive. Ryan Mallett is project? Do you even watch college football? He's the best passer in this draft. TheSmurfs22 04-25-2011, 08:53 PM I would like it if the Skins would not draft a qb and trade down for more, much needed picks but I am not holding my breath. drew54 04-25-2011, 08:55 PM I thought it had been established you cannot trade future picks due to the CBA and lockout. Swarley 04-25-2011, 09:13 PM Ryan Mallett is project? Do you even watch college football? He's the best passer in this draft. I tend to agree, Mallet is the most plug and play ready out of all the QB's in this draft as long as you can protect him. diehard 04-25-2011, 09:27 PM I'd be ok with it for sure. That's why I've warmed up to taking a QB in the 5th round or later. On paper, this team isn't a playoff contender being able to draft any 1st round graded QB in this year's draft. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum