Replacement Players

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7

sportscurmudgeon
04-11-2011, 01:55 PM
Sports Illustrated had a poll and found that 63% of the people polled said they WOULD watch NFL games with replacement players.

Everyone take a deep breath here. Things are still VERY far away from anything like "Replacement Games".

But since there is nothing real to talk about with regard to the NFL at the moment while Judge Nelson is writing her ruling - - I have to think she has made up her mind by now and is simply crafting her decision into legal language - - why not pose the question here:


Would you watch NFL games if they used replacement players?

Before answering, remember what TV viewing options for sports on Sundays exist in the Fall:

1. MLB playoffs and World Series

2. Pac-12 MIGHT put a game of the week on Sunday this year

3. NASCAR

4. Golf

5. Bowling

6. Poker

7. Tennis

8. Rodeo

9. Fishing


Personally, I would probably watch Replacement Games unenthusiastically because the alternatives are even less appealing.

NC_Skins
04-11-2011, 02:01 PM
Why do people keep bring up Replacement players in this topic? You do realize this isn't the players striking, it's the owners locking out the players. There cannot be or will not be any replacement players during a lockout. It defeats the point of a owner lockout.


Also, sure we might watch games with replacement players, but would you still pay 5-10K on tickets, parking, etc to watch people with inferior talent? Hell no.

They should ask these same people if they would pay the same amount in these polls. My guess is you'd have a shit ton of more people saying absolutely not rather than yes.

SmootSmack
04-11-2011, 02:02 PM
UFL games may be on as well

hooskins
04-11-2011, 02:03 PM
The Replacements was on TBS last night. For the millionth time.

Chico23231
04-11-2011, 02:05 PM
^ right NC Skins. I wouldnt watch scabs regardless...I wish to god everyone that has the NFL ticket or any NFL subscriptions would pick up their phone and cancel that sh*t and vote how they feel with there wallet. I really pissed in these tough economic times how selfish both sides have acted, Goodell IMO has been piss poor throughout the CBA bullsh*t

SkinzWin
04-11-2011, 02:13 PM
^^Preach on brother man.

celts32
04-11-2011, 02:35 PM
I would watch replacement games on TV but as a season ticket holder and DTV Sunday Ticket subscriber...I would be VERY opposed to paying for them.

The NFL has already said that replacement players are not an option.

freddyg12
04-11-2011, 02:45 PM
I would watch but I would not worry about missing plays. I might even answer the phone during the game. It would be more like watching regular season basketball for me. I watch it, but I'm not glued to the tv.

MTK
04-11-2011, 02:51 PM
I'm guessing a large majority of that 63% in favor aren't old enough to remember 1987 very well.

Personally I wouldn't watch and I definitely wouldn't pay for the Sunday Ticket to watch scrubs.

freddyg12
04-11-2011, 03:16 PM
I'm guessing a large majority of that 63% in favor aren't old enough to remember 1987 very well.

Personally I wouldn't watch and I definitely wouldn't pay for the Sunday Ticket to watch scrubs.

I remember the 87 games. It was alright because it was kind of like theater, or watching a live news telecast because you want to see what happens, even though it ain't pretty. After a few games the novelty of that wears off though. It would be tough to sit through 16 games of it.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum