Mark Ingram at #10?

While Mike Shanahan has a reputation for finding unheralded running backs, I have a hunch that he’ll have a hard time passing on Alabama’s Mark Ingram with the No. 10 pick if Ingram is available. The Redskins don’t have third- and fourth-round picks, and I could envision a first-round scenario in which that leads them to Ingram.

Quick-hit thoughts around NFL & Pats - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston (http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4694305/quick-hit-thoughts-around-nfl-pats-50)

Thoughts on this possibility?

The guy is a stud and we definitely need another RB, but at #10 I think we have other more pressing needs.

Can't see it happening. Doesn't fit Shanahan's pattern with RBs anyway. I think they're going D (still think Robert Quinn) if they stay at #10

I'm in no way saying our RB's we have now are studs especially after one year, but I personally think the RB's we have now can get the job done and be beasts if given the chance. However it all starts up front. The teams OL didn't block well. Mybe because it was the first year in a zone blocking scheme or the team just doesn't have the players right now for a zone blocking scheme but the blocking could have been better for both the run and the passing.

I'd rather see the team drop out of the 10th pick to aquire more picks. I've started picking up all the "Draft" magazines and honestly I don't like any one of their ideas 100% but each one brings about some good ideas.

For whatever reason when I hear "we need a RB" or "I hope they take (whoever) at RB" I cringe. I think we can survive with what we have,and pick up: QB, NT, OL, WR, LB/DE, CB. I forget how many picks we have. Hopefully they bring in a ton of UDFA's.

we have to go Paea or Phil Taylor this is a big need to plug the defensive middle.

we have to go Paea or Phil Taylor this is a big need to plug the defensive middle.

At #10?

I have heard Ingram compared to Emmit Smith...although Smith was obviously a great player if i am going to spend the #10 pick on a RB Smith is not the comparison I want that RB to have. Basically I would want a homerun threat in the Adrian Peterson or Chris Johnson mold for that high of a pick.

I agree the pick is probably defense but i would also spend it on a QB if there was one on the board with a high enough Shanny grade on him.

THat would be the worst move ever for us. Paea or Taylor at 10 would be just as bad. There is no chance any of those three go at #10. Mods are free to go ahead and lock this thread, lol.... all done here.

At #10? If we don't get a capable tackle, our defense will be swiss cheese again. I say do like Jacksonville did last year, get the guy that will help your team the most and get the most out of the 1st pick. Just curious, do you like the Ingram pick better? If were going to reach at 10 take the tackle.

THat would be the worst move ever for us. Paea or Taylor at 10 would be just as bad. There is no chance any of those three go at #10. Mods are free to go ahead and lock this thread, lol.... all done here.
Oh yeah Von Miller will be there at 10....NOT!

Ingram at 10, no way...needs/best player available for us at ten is not Ingram