Monkeydad
02-23-2011, 01:02 PM
There will always been plenty of guns & god capitalist pigs to counteract the bleeding heart liberal treehuggers
You called?
Amen to that. We'll fight for old D.C.
You called?
Amen to that. We'll fight for old D.C.
Name changeMonkeydad 02-23-2011, 01:02 PM There will always been plenty of guns & god capitalist pigs to counteract the bleeding heart liberal treehuggers You called? Amen to that. We'll fight for old D.C. irish 02-23-2011, 01:59 PM The name links us to our heritage. Changing the name would be a major loss for the team and Snyder would lose $millions in having to change marketing/signs/etc. Maybe it was wrong from the start to inherit the Braves than change it to Redskins, (what the redskins have to do with DC is beyond me) but its fiction. I always loved The Senators but thankfully we didnt switch to the Nationals- (that name is pretty 'tarded) The pittance they'd spend in new signage (marketing is always changing so I dont see that as an increased cost) would be more than offset with the sales of new hats, shirts, mugs, etc. As a historical note, even when Washington's baseball team was called the Senators their officical name was Nationals and had been since the 1860s. Charley Brotman took to calling them the Senators because he couldnt come up with a good logo for Nationals and then everyone started calling them the Senators. Nationals wasnt some name they pulled out of thin air. celts32 02-23-2011, 02:21 PM The pittance they'd spend in new signage (marketing is always changing so I dont see that as an increased cost) would be more than offset with the sales of new hats, shirts, mugs, etc. As a historical note, even when Washington's baseball team was called the Senators their officical name was Nationals and had been since the 1860s. Charley Brotman took to calling them the Senators because he couldnt come up with a good logo for Nationals and then everyone started calling them the Senators. Nationals wasnt some name they pulled out of thin air. They wouldn't make a dime of that new merchandise money from me. In my mind if they change the name the team I grew up loving would be dead. I am not from the Washington DC area so i would have no natural reason to cheer for a team from Washington DC that was not the Redskins. The Redskins are my team. Son Of Man 02-23-2011, 02:22 PM There will always been plenty of guns & god capitalist pigs to counteract the bleeding heart liberal treehuggers Love this quote!!! mlmpetert 02-23-2011, 02:27 PM I honestly cant see it happening unless the Redskins become a consistently winning team. I mean if there was ever a reason for a fan to defect it would be because the name was changed. There will be a lot of PR stuff out of Redskins park saying that’s its still the same organization with the same legends and traditions, but at the end of the day I think a lot of people will view it as its no longer the same team. It will give people a easy reason to switch teams if they are tired of mediocre play. And some people may also say I don’t want to route for a team that switched names; ie my team is the Redskins and they no longer exist. Now if the Redskins are playing great and have been for some time the organization could probably get away with changing names and not losing a lot of fans. But that makes for a little bit of a catch 22. 90% of Native Americans embrace the name Redskins; it more plays into the warrior heritage to them and puts them in a favorable light. Im sure Native Americans would be more okay with it as long as the team is considered a joke and continues with years of poor – mediocre play. But do it while theyre winning it kind of disrespects Native Americans. 'Redskins' mascot acceptable, poll says - NFC East- NBC Sports (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/6093796/) irish 02-23-2011, 02:32 PM They wouldn't make a dime of that new merchandise money from me. In my mind if they change the name the team I grew up loving would be dead. I am not from the Washington DC area so i would have no natural reason to cheer for a team from Washington DC that was not the Redskins. The Redskins are my team. But its still the same team, just a different name. It amazes me that anyone cares what they are called. I am a fan of the team no matter what silly nickname they use. mlmpetert 02-23-2011, 02:35 PM Also thinking about what i just said. If the team were to move to LA (or another city) would you still be a Redskins fan? Its the same team just a different location. skinsfaninok 02-23-2011, 02:40 PM But its still the same team, just a different name. It amazes me that anyone cares what they are called. I am a fan of the team no matter what silly nickname they use. It works both ways honestly irish 02-23-2011, 02:42 PM Also thinking about what i just said. If the team were to move to LA (or another city) would you still be a Redskins fan? Its the same team just a different location. Yes but I do think changing cities is a lot different than changing nicknames. I think the answer would depend on if one lives in DC or not. I suspect the DC person would dump them while someone in TN doesnt care quite as much where they are playing as long as the uniform and name are the same. mlmpetert 02-23-2011, 02:48 PM But its still the same team, just a different name. It amazes me that anyone cares what they are called. I am a fan of the team no matter what silly nickname they use. Its not a nickname its the actual name. Its different then a high school or college mascot. The team is firmly grounded in the name / is the name. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum