National Football Post ranks all 31 NFL Stadiums.

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5

Slingin Sammy 33
02-22-2011, 03:02 PM
I have seen most of you folks really complain about FedEx especially traffic. Must be pretty bad, interesting enough this article complains about the Neighborhood location But I think most stadiums are in the "rougher" neighborhoods, I would figure the land would be cheaper. I'm not sure the writer knows what the hell he's talking about. Maybe he's getting Fed-Ex and RFK mixed up. Most games I've gone to at Fed-Ex, I've taken Metro and walked from the stop. Never felt the least bit concerned for mine or my son's safety(including night games). Last time I checked they don't have $ 300K + townhouses on the walk from the train to the stadium in "rough" areas. I'll bet there are far more arrests per year in Fed-Ex and in the parking lot than there are in the area immediately surrounding Fed-Ex.

BringBackJoeT
02-22-2011, 04:47 PM
This isn't a list to be taken seriously. Several years ago, Jim Caple at ESPN did a season-long tour of MLB stadiums in which he ranked each team's venue from a score derived from ten different categories (or something like that). The scores weren't perfect, and there was room for disagreement, but overall, it was a great series to follow, given the depth of analysis for each team. By contrast, this is a list that seems like it was scratched together on a long plane ride. The writer is glaringly inconsistent in some of his points and, as just about everyone else has said, ludicrously labels as a warzone an area that basically has distinguished itself by its barrenness.

While I haven't been to Arrowhead, I'm assuming a more seriously contemplated list of NFL stadiums would have it ranked near the top. Additionally, Ralph Wilson would probably register a much higher ranking, and the writer himself actually makes the case for RW being higher in his description of it, despite his ranking of it as #20.

skinsfaninok
02-22-2011, 06:26 PM
I'm not sure the writer knows what the hell he's talking about. Maybe he's getting Fed-Ex and RFK mixed up. Most games I've gone to at Fed-Ex, I've taken Metro and walked from the stop. Never felt the least bit concerned for mine or my son's safety(including night games). Last time I checked they don't have $ 300K + townhouses on the walk from the train to the stadium in "rough" areas. I'll bet there are far more arrests per year in Fed-Ex and in the parking lot than there are in the area immediately surrounding Fed-Ex.

I always heard how ghetto RFK was but not FED EX

tryfuhl
02-22-2011, 07:19 PM
Philly's stadiums are in a sports complex that's sort of cordoned off from surrounding neighborhoods. But there are surrounding neighborhoods; South Philadelphia. They're not bad neighborhoods; they're working class.

You can walk around those neighborhoods at night and not run into trouble.

But you're right, you don't really feel like the stadiums are amongst neighborhoods because they're kind of cordoned off, and the exits to the interstate are right there. You just hop right back on 95 and you're out of there.
yep, never had a prob in the area

Monkeydad
02-23-2011, 02:24 PM
Giantone:

Lincoln Financial Field is in a good neighborhood with good road access, public transit and parking. The stadium is top-shelf too.

The fans who inhabit the stadium - - and their average state of iniebriation - - leave something to be desired. But Lincoln Financial Field is a light-year ahead of Fed Ex.

I have not yet been to New Meadowlands so I cannot say what that stadium is like.

I've been to the old Meadowlands for a concert. It's just in a complex off the NJ turnpike. (exit 16 if I remember right). No neighborhood around.

Good to know about the Linc...going there in June with my son for a Monster Jam event. :D


Baltimore is the same way. Camden Yards and M&T are beside each other and in a clean, safe part of Baltimore, one of the few. You can take the Metro literally right up to the stadiums and it's about 2-3 blocks from the Inner Harbor.

Stay near the Harbor when in Baltimore. You'll get mugged, shot and an STD if you venture one street over too far.

GTripp0012
02-23-2011, 06:22 PM
This isn't a list to be taken seriously. Several years ago, Jim Caple at ESPN did a season-long tour of MLB stadiums in which he ranked each team's venue from a score derived from ten different categories (or something like that). The scores weren't perfect, and there was room for disagreement, but overall, it was a great series to follow, given the depth of analysis for each team. By contrast, this is a list that seems like it was scratched together on a long plane ride. The writer is glaringly inconsistent in some of his points and, as just about everyone else has said, ludicrously labels as a warzone an area that basically has distinguished itself by its barrenness.

While I haven't been to Arrowhead, I'm assuming a more seriously contemplated list of NFL stadiums would have it ranked near the top. Additionally, Ralph Wilson would probably register a much higher ranking, and the writer himself actually makes the case for RW being higher in his description of it, despite his ranking of it as #20.I was at Arrowhead in January (not the playoff game), and I really wasn't very impressed by the stadium, particularly the 2009 re-design. Cool atmosphere and everything, but the stadium struck me as a big, old building which wasn't improved in any way by the renovations, and the upper deck is a pain in the butt to navigate, as parts of the upperdeck just end, and then you have to go down/up a level to reach the next quarter of the stadium.

Ford Field is the most impressive sports venue I have ever been in. But there are a whole bunch of NFL venues (including FedEx) that I've never been to.

sportscurmudgeon
02-23-2011, 09:39 PM
Gtripp:

I had been to the old Silverdome in Pontiac but have not seen Ford Field. I presume from your location that you probably also visited the Silverdome.

For its time, I thought the Silverdome was a lot better than most of the other "first generation domes". How is Ford Field better - - other than the fact that it is newer and with advanced tech gadgets?

TheSmurfs22
02-23-2011, 09:48 PM
Went to a game at Arrowhead years ago when my brother and sister-in-law lived in KC. It was a great stadium all the way around. It reminded me of RFK in some ways. Nothing fancy, the way stadiums used to be.

TheSmurfs22
02-23-2011, 09:53 PM
Denver has a nice stadium, I have never been there for a game but have visited the stadium. I used to work for the Panthers and when they built their stadium it was one of the better ones. Their admin offices are all based out of there too. I remember the guys from Pburg and NE came to check out how we had things laid out especially in the basement where I worked. The location of the stadium is in an awkward part of town. It doesn't really lend itself to tailgating. However most Carolina fans tend to be of the wine and cheese variety.

GTripp0012
02-24-2011, 02:14 AM
Gtripp:

I had been to the old Silverdome in Pontiac but have not seen Ford Field. I presume from your location that you probably also visited the Silverdome.

For its time, I thought the Silverdome was a lot better than most of the other "first generation domes". How is Ford Field better - - other than the fact that it is newer and with advanced tech gadgets?Grew up near Chicago, and I have never been to the Silverdome. I do live with someone who grew up in Dearborn, and thus has been to the Silverdome multiple times, but it wouldn't help to make a comparsion.

Ford Field blew me away with how a football venue can be built to have state of the art facilities from the bathrooms to the concessions, to the the sightlines, be indoors, be as large as the stadium is, and still not have the game experience ruined by a stadium that is as large and not open-air as Ford Field is. Basically, I was impressed by the gameday experience, even though the Skins-Lions game I went to was in Detroit's 0-16 year.

Arrowhead, by comparison, is a really impressive football atmosphere, but for a football-only stadium, really was kind of a pain. There are "good" kinds of old, and Arrowhead wasn't of that kind. I know they did a really expensive renovation on it recently, but I have a hard team believing the stadium improved in any meaningful way.

(Kauffman Stadium (KC Royals) -- on the other hand -- is a beautiful venue, albiet preposterously limited in # of seats for an MLB park. I suppose though if you're the Royals, that doesn't much matter.)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum