Snyder Camp Upset!!

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43

NC_Skins
02-11-2011, 04:38 PM
Please share what these illegal practicies are.

The illegal practices of slamming (one of the main focuses of this lawsuit). His company (and verizon) was fined in 2001 for the tune of 3.1 million along with this. This doesn't even included the acts that went on in California.

Under the Snyder/Verizon agreement, Snyder Direct Services, the division of Snyder Communications which marketed GTE’s long-distance in Florida, will shut down and forever cease all operations in Florida. Snyder Communications has in turn agreed to suspend all in-person solicitations of long-distance customers for 10 years.


His lawyer is claiming they didn't own the company then, which is false. They owned the company when the investigation was going on and the fines were handed out for crimes (forging names) during the period he owned the company. They just sold the company before the judgment was handed down. That ploy where "oh, i'm the owner, i had no idea what went on" doesn't fly unfortunately. As a CEO, you are indeed responsible for the actions of your corporation.

Just so you have a idea on what really went on.

Generally, for every 10 people slammed, only one will actually call the PSC to complain, he said. With Verizon, the Office of Public Counsel estimated that more than 3,000 people were probably slammed.

Telephone Customers Still Being `Slammed' - Page 2 - Orlando Sentinel (http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2002-02-03/news/0202020348_1_slamming-regulators-fines/2)


If you want more details on the illegal moves that Danny boy made, you can check out this thread here.
The Phone Slamming King: How Snyder Communications made Dan Snyder rich, 1997-1999 ... rich enough to buy the Washington Redskins (http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?343947-The-Phone-Slamming-King-How-Snyder-Communications-made-Dan-Snyder-rich-1997-1999-...-rich-enough-to-buy-the-Washington-Redskins)

Dude has done some extensive search into the background of the SNC companies and has legal documents to prove it.

SirClintonPortis
02-11-2011, 05:15 PM
:FIREdevil You know, I do make an appearance in that thread NC_Skins linked to.

I'm sure you all are capable of distinguishing between facts and opinion.

CRedskinsRule
02-11-2011, 05:23 PM
and again, ES color scheme gives me massive headaches!

NC_Skins
02-11-2011, 05:31 PM
and again, ES color scheme gives me massive headaches!

Funny, I thought it would have been all the idiots....lol

firstdown
02-11-2011, 06:01 PM
The illegal practices of slamming (one of the main focuses of this lawsuit). His company (and verizon) was fined in 2001 for the tune of 3.1 million along with this. This doesn't even included the acts that went on in California.




His lawyer is claiming they didn't own the company then, which is false. They owned the company when the investigation was going on and the fines were handed out for crimes (forging names) during the period he owned the company. They just sold the company before the judgment was handed down. That ploy where "oh, i'm the owner, i had no idea what went on" doesn't fly unfortunately. As a CEO, you are indeed responsible for the actions of your corporation.

Just so you have a idea on what really went on.



If you want more details on the illegal moves that Danny boy made, you can check out this thread here.
The Phone Slamming King: How Snyder Communications made Dan Snyder rich, 1997-1999 ... rich enough to buy the Washington Redskins (http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?343947-The-Phone-Slamming-King-How-Snyder-Communications-made-Dan-Snyder-rich-1997-1999-...-rich-enough-to-buy-the-Washington-Redskins)

Dude has done some extensive search into the background of the SNC companies and has legal documents to prove it.

Sorry I asked. I don't really have time to read that crap. Thanks though.

Ruhskins
02-11-2011, 06:10 PM
Sorry I asked. I don't really have time to read that crap. Thanks though.

:lol:

Longtimefan
02-11-2011, 06:16 PM
The illegal practices of slamming (one of the main focuses of this lawsuit). His company (and verizon) was fined in 2001 for the tune of 3.1 million along with this. This doesn't even included the acts that went on in California.




His lawyer is claiming they didn't own the company then, which is false. They owned the company when the investigation was going on and the fines were handed out for crimes (forging names) during the period he owned the company. They just sold the company before the judgment was handed down. That ploy where "oh, i'm the owner, i had no idea what went on" doesn't fly unfortunately. As a CEO, you are indeed responsible for the actions of your corporation.

Just so you have a idea on what really went on.



If you want more details on the illegal moves that Danny boy made, you can check out this thread here.
The Phone Slamming King: How Snyder Communications made Dan Snyder rich, 1997-1999 ... rich enough to buy the Washington Redskins (http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?343947-The-Phone-Slamming-King-How-Snyder-Communications-made-Dan-Snyder-rich-1997-1999-...-rich-enough-to-buy-the-Washington-Redskins)

Dude has done some extensive search into the background of the SNC companies and has legal documents to prove it.

Just two months ago I received an unauthorized bill from Verizon connecting an additional charge from a company called USBI in the amount of $16.32 to my monthly bill. I contacted Verizon and informed them of the fact I had made no subscription to USBI, didn't know their function or what service they had provided. Verizon's representative advised me to contact USBI which I did.

After finally being able to speak with an agent of the company and informed him of my situation, I was told that someone [whom they apparently thought was me] had, using my phone and computer, submitted an online subscription form requesting one of the services they provided and billed me for. I knew then I was being slammed and immediately began to check around the internet only to find many other people who were victims of the same scam.

I informed both the representative from USBI and Verizon that I had no intention of paying for any additional service of which I didn't subscribe too. I was assured by the rogue company that I would receive a credit and be relieved of any further obligation. I refused to pay Verizon the $16.32 and my next months' bill was adjusted minus the additional charges.

USBI | Telephone Bill Complaints | Unauthorized Phone Charges? | Consumer Complaints (http://classactionconnect.com/consumer-complaints/usbi-telephone-bill-complaints-unauthorized-phone-charges/)

skinsfaninok
02-12-2011, 08:41 PM
Lawsuit is the wrong way to alter Snyder’s image | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/12/lawsuit-seems-like-wrong-way-to-alter-snyders-image/)

NC_Skins
02-12-2011, 11:29 PM
Letter from Atalaya Capital Management Lawyer Curtis Krasik to Washington Redskins General Counsel David Donovan (http://www.scribd.com/doc/48061516/Letter-from-Atalaya-Capital-Management-Lawyer-Curtis-Krasik-to-Washington-Redskins-General-Counsel-David-Donovan)


Washington City Paper's response letter from it's legal reps. Oh my, he destroys David Donovan like he was some sort of mental midget. (and he is)

Longtimefan
04-03-2011, 09:44 AM
Interesting: Daly has spawned eight decades in an effort to portray similarity. I found this article compelling to read.

[Quote] "The Writer Dosen't Have To Be 100% Right; He Just Has To Be In The Ballpark" [Un\]

DALY: Echoes of '30s NFL libel case in Snyder suit - Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/27/echoes-of-30s-nfl-libel-case-in-snyder-suit/)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum