Snyder Camp Upset!!

Ted?

Marchibroda ? Dansen ?

Haha, awesome. Somebody give McKenna a raise.

Ted?


Shit sorry. When the bids for this first started weren't Snyder and Leonsis were in the same group.....and then things changed and Ted Leonsis was making a bid with his own group without Snyder.I think the argument was that the Bid came in a certain way...switching the majority owners should have made for a new bid altogther..yes/no?

Leonsis was in a a group bidding for the skins?

Shit sorry. When the bids for this first started weren't Snyder and Leonsis were in the same group.....and then things changed and Ted Leonsis was making a bid with his own group without Snyder.I think the argument was that the Bid came in a certain way...switching the majority owners should have made for a new bid altogther..yes/no?

Leonsis was never part of this

You use the word "hate" associated with my posting, not my choice of word.

The bottom line with Dan Snyder is the dollar. As with other owners. But the difference with Dan Snyder has been itemized by the article in the law suit. I just don't think that Mr. Snyder gives a hill of beans about his loyalties to the Washington Redskins. It's an investment first and foremost and not this BS about his life long love for the Redskins.

Little boy in a candy shop is not a good analogy of Dan's reckless ownership of this franchise. The maverick who is not a maverick in terms of showing a positive direction of owning a franchise that had some moxie during the time when Dan bought it.

Let's hope Mike Shanahan and Bruce Allen can restore it to respectability again without Dan Snyder's interference.

So, hate is the wrong word. Disrespect is the right word in describing my present feelings towards Mr. Snyder.

Without debating whether DS "wants to win" or "cares about the Redskins", I would just say that based on my observation & the reactions he's spurred from some around him, I don't see the Danny as being a good leader. I won't question all his intentions, but it just doesn't seem he has the ability to truly drive others toward success, rather he commands respect, loyalty & complicity to his demands at the expense of progress toward the greater goal.

Leonsis was never part of this


I thought he and Dan were in first and then Dan went with the Milstead group.

I thought he and Dan were in first and then Dan went with the Milstead group.

I've never heard that

Yeah I didn't know he was Jewish either, and to throw out the anti-semite card is so pathetic. Like Feinstein said, none of this has anything to do with anti-semitism. It has to do with anti-Snyder.

The Little Danny wants this guy fired plain and simple. He's got no shot to win that lawsuit. I personally thought the article was hilarious. I don't care for Dan Snyder, and I'm glad he's getting roasted for this.

I know Snyder has done some good things as far as charitable donations (not like it affects him considering how much money he has), and I know he flew everyone to Sean's funeral, etc etc. But his douchebaggery FAR outweighs any good he's done. I personally don't really think that's even up for debate.

Dan Snyder has a right to protect his reputation against defamatory remarks and depictions; however, he faces an uphill battle in this particular case, especially since he is easily labeled as a public figure. He is seeking $1 million+ in addition to punitive damages. Snyder must prove that those “lies, half-truths, innuendo and anti-Semitic imagery to smear, malign, defame and slander” actually damaged his reputation and he must prove with convincing clarity that WCP published the article with knowledge or in reckless disregard of its falsity and its defamatory character. In order for Snyder to have any chance on this one, he must prove that WCP had intent for actual malice.

SS I hope you arent upset towards me. I laid out my position, but I definitely respect your view. My apologies if I attacked you.