Carson Palmer demands trade, threatens to retire...

I think the Pro Bowl/DeAngelo threads already did that :)

It sure did.

I think the Pro Bowl/DeAngelo threads already did that :)

We obviously had nothing else to do today:) But your welcome.

Pure comedy every day.

The Onion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Onion)



Pure comedy is explaining The Onion with a link from Wikipedia.



It's actually accurate for once though. :D

Pure comedy is explaining The Onion with a link from Wikipedia.



It's actually accurate for once though. :D

It's not like printed encyclopedias are always correct. ;)

WARNING: Contains some bad language. But defines comedy
YouTube - Bob Nelson .. football skit

WARNING: Contains some bad language. But defines comedy

It's not like printed encyclopedias are always correct. ;)

But, they're not written in pencil so anyone can do change things around at the library as they wish.


Are you flirting with me? Stop that please.

But, they're not written in pencil so anyone can do change things around at the library as they wish.


Are you flirting with me? Stop that please.

There will always being enough "good cops" to utilize the banhammer or limiting the access to editing the article itself. Every change is logged as well.

Print is "permanent" and the error may go unnoticed for generations if the subject is even semi-obscure.

Wikipedia may have some biases in some articles where the subject lends itself to biased admins ****ing things up, but it's better than a printed encyclopedia from the 70s.

And there's a whole ton of spinoffs that may be better or worse depending on their specialty.

There will always being enough "good cops" to utilize the banhammer or limiting the access to editing the article itself. Every change is logged as well.

Print is "permanent" and the error may go unnoticed for generations if the subject is even semi-obscure.

Wikipedia may have some biases in some articles where the subject lends itself to biased admins ****ing things up, but it's better than a printed encyclopedia from the 70s.

And there's a whole ton of spinoffs that may be better or worse depending on their specialty.

If we set aside the issue of being current, no, Wikipedia is not as good as a printed encyclopedia. Encyclopedias hire experts to write their articles based on trained, in-depth research. In contrast, on Wikipedia any jackass can write anything they wish.

If we set aside the issue of being current, no, Wikipedia is not as good as a printed encyclopedia. Encyclopedias hire experts to write their articles based on trained, in-depth research. In contrast, on Wikipedia any jackass can write anything they wish.

The real question is "Will what they write remain 'published'?".

Per Adam S. Carson Palmer's house up for sale.