Jan 15-16 Playoff Thread

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10

tryfuhl
01-16-2011, 01:46 AM
I feel asleep like 5 mins into the 2nd game ugh

SouperMeister
01-16-2011, 02:44 AM
What makes Rodgers even better is he doesn't need a run gameI would take Rodgers TODAY over every other QB not named Brady. I'm amazed that he was selected #24 overall, one spot ahead of Jason Campbell. What might have been had he fallen to us???

Bucket
01-16-2011, 06:40 AM
I would take Rodgers TODAY over every other QB not named Brady. I'm amazed that he was selected #24 overall, one spot ahead of Jason Campbell. What might have been had he fallen to us???

He did fall to us. We decided to take Carlos Rogers

skinsfan57
01-16-2011, 10:45 AM
the packers looked damn good.where did Rodgers go to school?

skinsfaninok
01-16-2011, 10:50 AM
^ he went to CAL

skinsfan57
01-16-2011, 11:21 AM
thanks:food-smil

skinsfan69
01-16-2011, 12:09 PM
Aaron Rogers is simply taking his game to another level. He's putting himself right up there with Brady and Manning.

skinsfan69
01-16-2011, 12:13 PM
Flacco and his shitty receivers melted, what a waste. I don't know if you guys noticed, but during the TD return on that punt in the 4th quarter, #24 for the Steelers took an academy award dive that resulted in the TD being called back due to block on the back.

Just goes to show you that bringing in a bunch of big name wr's doesn't = a SB. And the two guys that Balt. got let them down yesterday. Where was Boldin? And TJ cried all season about not getting the ball, even though he knew he was going to be the #3 and he flat out drops the most important ball of his life.

skinsfan69
01-16-2011, 12:14 PM
Gotta give Green bay's front office and coaching staff some props. They've had a ton of injuries yet they're still rolling along.

GTripp0012
01-16-2011, 12:17 PM
I would take Rodgers TODAY over every other QB not named Brady. I'm amazed that he was selected #24 overall, one spot ahead of Jason Campbell. What might have been had he fallen to us???He would have been interesting in the Saunders scheme, but when you think that the Packers had to offer him three seasons of sitting behind Favre, plus two seasons as a starter as a good but flawed offense that couldn't bunch the wins together, it's VERY hard to imagine that even if the Redskins had taken Rodgers in 2005, he would have still been on the team in 2010.

You have to consider that even as recent as the 2008 draft, the Green Bay Packers were very divided on whether Rodgers had any value to them, which says something about his play in practice as well as his preseason sample. It's not THAT surprising that the Packers showed enough patience with their QB and head coach to reach the point that Rodgers and McCarthy have reached together. Had the Redskins drafted Rodgers done the same, it would have been the first time since the merger that they had reached this point.

In other words, our front office was simply not good enough to develop Rodgers into a top level QB. I think the one we have now -- flawed as it is -- probably could take the next Aaron Rodgers and make him a very good quarterback.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum