|
Big C 12-26-2010, 12:18 AM i wouldnt go 3-4 end in the first round. there arent any elite o-lineman in the first round either. we need offensive playmakers at wide receiver, a qb for the future, o-line, d-line, and another rush linebacker. i'd look at taking either blackmon at receiver in the first or a rush outside linebacker to compliment orakpo and take pressure off of him. if locker is there, i think shanahan would take him though.
i think grossman will be the opening day starting qb.
cdskins26 12-26-2010, 12:59 AM We need to draft o linemen in this draft and it appears this is a good year to do it as the pool looks pretty deep. Luck is the only "franchise" qb in this draft, at least based on tape. Ideally we get a top shelf lineman, perhaps a 3-4 DE or offensive lineman and then see what's available in the second round. If someone like Mallett or Locker has fallen, which is quite possible, take one, otherwise, add more linemen.
As for Haslett, you can't expect to have an elite 3-4 defense the first year you implement it, especially when your lacking in the personnel department. We have some of the pieces for it to work but we need to add either a stout end or a big nose tackle, another rush linebacker and for god's sake, can we draft a fricken FS? Then again, I wonder if Kevin Barnes might be able to take that spot. Either way, I feel that given more than one year and a healthy Laron Landry, the defense could turn into a monster.
While I understand we are all frustrated by two decades of continual sucking, the knee jerk reaction to fire Haslett is quite premature. Our defense gave up a lot of yards early and has to blitz constantly, but we forced a ton of turnovers and at least made up for the yardage by keeping the points allowed reasonable. The loss of Landry pretty much ruined the d not to mention the fact that our offense has been anemic at best for the majority of the season. With the additions of more 3-4 talent, we could turn into one of the leagues best. It just isn't going to happen over night.
This draft is definitely weaker towards the top with offensive linemen.
Last year, at 4-12 our defense was still top 10-12, and one year later we are 28-31. There is definitely some to blame on the coordinator when we didnt lose a whole lot on defense.
WilbursHomie 12-26-2010, 04:55 AM This draft is definitely weaker towards the top with offensive linemen.
Last year, at 4-12 our defense was still top 10-12, and one year later we are 28-31. There is definitely some to blame on the coordinator when we didnt lose a whole lot on defense.
I don't think it's Haslett's fault. You can't run a good scheme with out the right players. I blame Shanny because he's so married to the 3-4 in the first place. I've said a few times that it's much easier to build a good offense if you already have a good defense. It just seems like common sense to leave it the way it was, revamp the offensive side, then if you want, make the switch. Because it's also easier to rebuild a defense if your now working with a good offense. Doing them both at once seems like such an up hill battle that takes so long.
WilbursHomie 12-26-2010, 04:59 AM Most are projecting him in the mid to late 2nd round. Knock on him is he doesn't wow you physically and he may be as good as he's going to be. I'd love to be able to trade down in the 2nd, add a pick and get Ponder
I definitely wouldn't mind seeing that. Only if we picked up another pick and grabbed him up some protection. If he's not protected I've seen him fall apart and get rattled in a hurry. If he's feeling relaxed, he can beat you a lot of different ways.
Longtimefan 12-26-2010, 09:42 AM Who will be Washington Redskins' starting quarterback in 2011 NFL season? (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/25/AR2010122502040.html)
skinsfan_nn 12-26-2010, 12:50 PM Updated: December 26, 2010, 11:43 AM ET
Source: Donovan McNabb seeks release
By Adam Schefter
ESPN
Archive
Being that Donovan McNabb no longer is a part of the Washington Redskins' game plans, he has his own game plan in place for after this season, according to one person close to the quarterback.
NFC East blog
Mosley ESPN.com's Matt Mosley writes about all things NFC East in his division blog.
• Blog network: NFL Nation
After the season, McNabb is planning to meet with the Redskins and ask them for his release. McNabb wants to be in a position where he can pick the place to finish his career, not have it dictated to him as was the case last season when Philadelphia traded him to Washington.
It's highly unlikely the Redskins initially would release McNabb, not when they believe he still has some trade value. Washington would want to recoup as much as possible for the player whom they surrendered second- and fourth-round picks.
What will test McNabb's trade value is the $10 million option bonus in his contract that another team might have to pay. Yet there are any number of teams -- Minnesota, Seattle, San Francisco, Carolina, Tennessee and Miami -- with significant quarterback questions looming for 2011.
McNabb was benched only once in 11 years with Philadelphia, and he's already doubled that total with the Redskins since being acquired by the team in April. Shanahan yanked McNabb for Rex Grossman in the final two minutes against Detroit in October with the game on the line, then offered several strange excuses for the decision.
Earlier this season Mike Shanahan said he felt Grossman had a better grasp of the team's two-minute offense, then said McNabb lacked the "cardiovascular endurance" to run a fast-paced drill because of nagging hamstring injuries. Offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan said McNabb had been tipped off in advance that the team might go with Grossman; McNabb said he hadn't.
Then the Redskins gave McNabb a five-year contract extension worth up to $78 million -- though the quarterback is guaranteed to receive only an extra $3.5 million this season. The deal contains a clause that allows the Redskins to cut McNabb before next season with no further financial obligation.
But with McNabb intending to ask the Redskins for his release, and with Washington in the market to trade him, one result seems unavoidable. McNabb will not be a Redskin in 2011.
Dread-Skin 12-26-2010, 01:03 PM Screw mcnabb he will be let go b/c Coach wants him gone or if the money is too much on another aging cap heavy veteran (Wash. always finds ways to resign unwanted or over pay these aging vets). I wish his salary was low enough where we could keep him and stash him down the depth charts- he doesnt get to dictate his career simply by where he wants to finish.
Why did he reisgn if he isnt using the haynesworth take the money upfront then pee his pants and act a childish fool.
skinsfan57 12-26-2010, 03:32 PM in the washington post today mentioned marc bulger could be brought in for training camp next year.skins don't need more vet QB's.
SkinzWin 12-26-2010, 03:41 PM in the washington post today mentioned marc bulger could be brought in for training camp next year.skins don't need more vet QB's.
Ew, gross.
BaltimoreSkins 12-26-2010, 04:27 PM in the washington post today mentioned marc bulger could be brought in for training camp next year.skins don't need more vet QB's.
I get the impression that Bulger enjoys his role up here. He also has a legitimate shot at earning a ring if he stays in B-more.
|