mmil12
11-28-2010, 09:53 PM
Oh I agree, right now we just don't have the horses. Some don't seem to see that though.
I agree completely, but I just hope that Shanahan can pull a quality RB out of no where and we don't spend a top pick on one next year. We have too many holes to spend a high pick on an RB.
I would love to see more of Cooley and Davis on the field together. I think that can be an impressive combo if we can get it rolling. Davis, Cooley, Moss, and Armstrong are the only receivers we have. They should be on the field together more often. I also would like to see a little, not a lot, more of Banks on offense. If we can get him in space, he can make it happen.
skinsfaninok
11-28-2010, 09:57 PM
I agree completely, but I just hope that Shanahan can pull a quality RB out of no where and we don't spend a top pick on one next year. We have too many holes to spend a high pick on an RB.
I would love to see more of Cooley and Davis on the field together. I think that can be an impressive combo if we can get it rolling. Davis, Cooley, Moss, and Armstrong are the only receivers we have. They should be on the field together more often. I also would like to see a little, not a lot, more of Banks on offense. If we can get him in space, he can make it happen.
Banks sure is fun to watch my man.. We had that damn game won! Shanny will get a RB or 2 that will fit the scheme, hey who knows? Maybe Davis could be the guy.. Torain is good when healthy and Williams is decent but lacks speed and quickness.
SmootSmack
11-28-2010, 10:03 PM
Wonder if they'll reach out to Willie Parker again?
Dirtbag59
11-28-2010, 10:35 PM
Kyle is a good Coord. Our problem is personnel, no true Run game and very avg. WRs will hurt any team.
Does anyone know how many Int's this year should be credited to poor reciever play. I don't know if it was an exaggeration but I've heard that Galloway alone is responsible for 3 or 4. With Santana today it's at least around 4 or 5. Maybe the NFL should start using a receiver rating that gives receivers a TD:INT ratio.
We probably look at yards way to often without looking at how many passes they catch that are thrown their way. Not unlike NBA fans that look at PPG stats while ignoring field goal percentage. Then again maybe stats are overrated to begin with.
SirClintonPortis
11-28-2010, 11:46 PM
We probably look at yards way to often without looking at how many passes they catch that are thrown their way. Not unlike NBA fans that look at PPG stats while ignoring field goal percentage. Then again maybe stats are overrated to begin with.
Stats are pretty much "lossy compressed data" designed to approximate what was physical performed in the game. However, unlike ripping music files, stats can horribly mislead(aka change the actual notes played)
44ever
11-29-2010, 04:22 AM
Banks sure is fun to watch my man.. We had that damn game won! Shanny will get a RB or 2 that will fit the scheme, hey who knows? Maybe Davis could be the guy.. Torain is good when healthy and Williams is decent but lacks speed and quickness.
He would have been more fun to watch had he been used as a receiver. He would have been perfect on the kind of play they used Moss for when Moss slapped the ball.
What is wrong with dumping some short ones off to him and letting him go to work? Or letting him escape the secondary for something deep? We have the horses, we just leave them in the barn.
skinsguy
11-29-2010, 09:04 AM
Wonder if they'll reach out to Willie Parker again?
I was thinking the same thing. I don't believe he got picked up by anybody yet.
Pocket$ $traight
11-29-2010, 10:39 AM
I was thinking the same thing. I don't believe he got picked up by anybody yet.
I heard a report that they reached out to him and he declined.
SmootSmack
11-29-2010, 10:42 AM
I heard a report that they reached out to him and he declined.
Yup, that's why I said I wonder if they'll reach out again?
GridIron26
11-29-2010, 01:07 PM
Why would Parker accept the offer next time if he declined it in first place? More money in the offer or?