Here's what I'm worried about...

I'm worried about how we as a fan base may deal with a winning team again?

I think some on this board may still believe we are 4-12.

Honestly. If CP had played Clay M. wouldnt have gotten to DM so much.

I am not worried we beat the Packers because we beat them up all day and they could not handle the physical beating we gave them.

Don't let a few negative nellies ruin things for you. Apparently unless you have a Super Bowl team that is flat out dominating everyone you can't get excited about winning. That's just horseshit to me. We've gone from a 4-12 team with a buffoon in the front office to a competitive team that is playing their asses off each week, and we have quality people in place running things. If that's not progress I don't know what is.

We've knocked off 3 of the supposed heavy hitters in the NFC, 2-0 in the division, 3-1 in the conference, again... progress.

What is the deal with Dockery? I understand he's not a zone blocking type of guy. Fine I get that. But the guy that is in his place is terrible. I can't spell his name but he was getting owned. Dock wasn't even active which blows my mind.

I mentioned this a couple times last nite...I think its an absolute mistake not to have Dock at least active. Kory Lickinwhater the last couple games has not played well. I dont see how Dock could play worse than what Ive seen from Kory. I get Dock might not be a perfect fit for zone blocking scheme but come on, he should be considered at the least top tier depth in the interior. Not smart. Off season wish list includes an addition to the interior.

And what is up with Jamal Brown? Man hes been sorta of a disappointment...Heyer actually looked good considering what I saw from Brown. Yuck

I am worried about the bye week and what our record will be when we get there, but I'll save that for another thread.

I'm worried that Ace will start another thread.

Kareem Moore's open field tacking is very suspect. He totally whiffed on that 70 yard run by Jackson. Not good at all.

I'm pretty sure he was the worst player on the field in that game.

It looked like somebody put a mickey in his gatorade.

Look, I'm not going to start a thread that criticizes how we won, Damn...a win is a win, and I appreciate where we are right now. That being said, I have some areas where I would like to hear your thoughts.

O Line: McNabb was under pressure the entire game, and the running game was non-existent. Is the O Line really as bad as it looked tonight?

D Line: Rodgers had all day...all day. We got to him towards the end of the game, but for the most part he wasn't bothered. What does it take to get pressure on the QB?

Pass Coverage: It seemed like most throws from Rodgers resulted in a 6-10 yard gain. Why are we playing so soft...?

Banks...he better be returning every punt from now on...he can be and will be a game changer...no question. Thoughts?

#1- I think the OL is some where in between. I know it's not the best answer but in Zorn's scheme they sucked but in Shanahan's scheme they are much better.

They played one of the better DL's in the league Sun. and could not run the ball very well due to it so they had to find better ways to move the ball, ie; passing the ball to the RB beyond the DL but in the open or flat.

#2- I think the DL is a work in progress. They are still learning the scheme. I heard part of the reason they did better in the second half was the adjustment that was made. They started playing 3 Safeties in the game and for that it helped out. ... suposedly.

#3- I think we play soft at CB cause it's the by product of the scheme. I think they would rather have teams make the small play keeping the offense in front of them vs. giving up the big play and possible TD.

Personally it looks like when they play zone coverage I think they give the cushion. When they play man to man they are closer to the line and jam at the LOS. Some teams due to WR's they have the defense might have to play more zone vs. man to man.

Just my oppinion.

On top of what I said above,

I think if the Refs call all the pass interference calls the Packers committed a lot of our drives would have continued possibly resulting in points. But again thats all circumstantial. If they called all the holding penalties the packers committed on offense against our DL they would probably not done as well as they did.

In the end the Refs tried to let the teams play. I keep hearing that we could have been penalized on the Landry interception cause Jarmin hit Rogers helmet to helmet. Refs didn't call it.

I'm worried we might lose our 3rd game and then I'll be forced to change it to 13-3:)

But,so far so good..

Well Ace, that's the thing about predictions. You can't change it if your prediction doesn't go right, it's there for better or worse. So if we do go 14-2, well then you'll look like a genius and you'll get to reap the rewards. But if we do anything less than 14-2 your gonna be stuck with the flak, and believe me there will be flak. You can't change it once you post it.

Boy does anybody realize how much progress we've made? We won 4 games in 16 tries last season. We've already won 3 games in 5 tries this season. 'Nuff said. Sure they weren't dominating wins, but the fact that we won these games, against 3 playoff teams from last season, speaks dividends. Obviously there's a lot of work left to be done but this team is above and beyond what we had last year.

On top of what I said above,

I think if the Refs call all the pass interference calls the Packers committed a lot of our drives would have continued possibly resulting in points. But again thats all circumstantial. If they called all the holding penalties the packers committed on offense against our DL they would probably not done as well as they did.

In the end the Refs tried to let the teams play. I keep hearing that we could have been penalized on the Landry interception cause Jarmin hit Rogers helmet to helmet. Refs didn't call it.

Just saw the replay, Jarmon just pancaked him. I didn't see any helmet to helmet at all.