SouperMeister
10-06-2010, 11:26 AM
3rd and 4th for Brandon Marshall. Ha! I wish
The Duckett move was my least favorite move (arguably) of the past decade. I saw no point in it, especially since we never actually used himI guess I was wishing too :) - that 3 and 4 was traded for Brandon Lloyd. Adding insult to injury, Snyder/Gibbs tore up the last year of his contract and handed him a $10M bonus before he played a down - ouch.
firstdown
10-06-2010, 11:43 AM
This has been the year of some high profile players getting traded for little compensation.
Ruhskins
10-06-2010, 11:47 AM
Question:
Would NE now trade for V Jackson? Certainly they have the picks.
The Pats need help in their defense, so I would say they'd go for a defensive player if one became available.
SFREDSKIN
10-06-2010, 11:55 AM
Question:
Would NE now trade for V Jackson? Certainly they have the picks.
My guess is yes. They sure have the draft picks to do it and it will happen.
over the mountain
10-06-2010, 11:58 AM
Maybe Favre can help salvage my $$ league team. He killed me in the first 3 games.
as he did i. (i think that is a proper but odd grammactical sentence, FD?)
i traded maclin and favre for romo and fred jackson to get out of the favre mess but the damage is already done.
good for moss, vikes and pats. moss was going after this season anyways, vikes get a boost in team and fan morale with the (false) hope that moss can turn things back around and the pats get a 3rd for a player who was walking anyways.
this has to hurt the pats chances thoo, i dont see the emergence of hernandez as insurance for making this move.
Monkeydad
10-06-2010, 12:08 PM
i traded maclin and favre for romo and fred jackson to get out of the favre mess but the damage is already done.
Yikes. :hitfan:
Stacks42
10-06-2010, 12:23 PM
I am not a big fan of the skins throwing around draft picks, but both Moss and M. Lynch were traded for almost nothing. Those two positions (WR and RB) are glaring holes with the skins right now.
Hail to the Redskins
10-06-2010, 12:25 PM
Something on... but off the subject...
Guess the total amount of catches this past Sunday for "the Mosses" Randy & Santana COMBINED.
Answer: ZERO.
I'd venture to say that's the first time EVER that these 2 guys were healthy, played an entire game, and the two combined for no catches on the same day. It's extremely rare enough that either one has a no-catch day as is..
Now off the subject...
I meant to mention this in another thread... but Donovan/Redskins didn't even target Santana Moss once Sunday... it was very odd watching our pass offense in the 2nd Half...
McNabb's 2nd Half: 2-for-11 for 10 yds and an INT... yuck. :vomit:
Something on... but off the subject...
Guess the total amount of catches this past Sunday for "the Mosses" Randy & Santana COMBINED.
Answer: ZERO.
I'd venture to say that's the first time EVER that these 2 guys were healthy, played an entire game, and neither had a catch.
Now off the subject...
I meant to mention this in another thread... but Donovan/Redskins didn't even target Santana Moss once Sunday... it was very odd watching our pass offense in the 2nd Half...
McNabb's 2nd Half: 2-for-11 for 10 yds and an INT... yuck. :vomit:
Randy Moss has 5 games in his career where he was held without a catch. Not sure about Santana but I would say he's probably had a few too.
Hail to the Redskins
10-06-2010, 12:44 PM
Randy Moss has 5 games in his career where he was held without a catch. Not sure about Santana but I would say he's probably had a few too.
I meant the two guys.. "the Mosses"... on the same day didn't catch a pass. I noticed immediately after our game that Santana didn't, then when I heard Randy didn't ... that's pretty damn rare.