Sheriff Gonna Getcha
11-25-2004, 01:30 PM
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/football/nfl/11/24/bc.fbn.raiders.porter.ap/index.html
For all those Gardner haters out there (which, by now seems to include just about everyone but me), Porter has expressed doubt about returning to the Raiders. If he tests free agency, as he claims he intends to, he'll probably command a signing bonus of about $7 million, but he'd be a pretty good #2 wideout.
EEich
11-25-2004, 01:45 PM
No thank you. He's bad news.
I'd rather stick with Gardner
Redskins_P
11-25-2004, 03:00 PM
Porter is a home town guy. He played high school ball in DC. I think he would be a good #2 also. He has size and pretty good speed.
Redskins_P
11-25-2004, 03:01 PM
No thank you. He's bad news.
EEICH, why do you say he's bad news? Have you heard anything? I'm just asking because I haven't heard anything too negative about him.
Shane
11-25-2004, 03:53 PM
Porter doesn't have the focus in my opinion to be someone you can rely on. I wouldn't trade any of our receivers for him. He hasn't been able to step up to be the guy his whole career and is seeing a bunch of rookies and young players catch all the balls at a time he should be coming into his own. He probably will never be able to star for any team.
aehs77
11-25-2004, 05:29 PM
our recievers would be tight if they get out of the current funk they are in
Skins4SB
11-25-2004, 07:24 PM
I wouldn't mid having him over Gardner. I don't hate Gardner, but I think Porter has better hands than Gardner. Why is Porter bad news?
skins009
11-25-2004, 10:17 PM
We don't need Porter, we don't have the money, and we are fine at WR. What we need is to have surgery on LC toe, so he can be a big time threat again.
Daseal
11-25-2004, 10:21 PM
I don't like the guy, but if we're going after another receiver (I like Gardner) we could try for Mike Williams out of USC (kinda)