WaldSkins
09-26-2010, 08:32 PM
Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Blache and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?
As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have?
rypper11
09-26-2010, 08:34 PM
Why not McNabb/Shanny but with Blache? I know people didn't like his "boring" defenses, but they didn't look this bad week after week.
DynamiteRave
09-26-2010, 08:35 PM
I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.
WaldSkins
09-26-2010, 08:36 PM
I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.
HA, that really wasnt a option.
Bushead
09-26-2010, 08:36 PM
I think the switch will be really beneficial over time, but it will also take time to get there.
DynamiteRave
09-26-2010, 08:38 PM
HA, that really wasnt a option.
Then Haslett/McNabb. McNabb at least puts us in a position to win. JC is doing in Oak what he should've been doing here. Riding the pine.
Chico23231
09-26-2010, 08:39 PM
Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Zorn and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?
As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have?
K, its not that bad. Zorn and Campbell was pretty f*cking bad. Ill take McNabb and Haslett
diehard
09-26-2010, 08:43 PM
Good question. McNabb and Kyle are definite upgrades. What Mike, Kyle, and Jim need to realize is that what was successful for other teams isn't a determination to totally scrap what we already do well. Let's see more power running, working some stretch plays in. Need I mention the defense? You can play more aggressively (exotic blitzes) while preserving the 4-3 schemes.
chewman
09-26-2010, 08:44 PM
doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck
Chico23231
09-26-2010, 08:46 PM
doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck
+100