Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

I bet if we made it our 3rd & 4th, we could probably get Wes Welker too. We should totally go for it.

Hell, throw in McNabb and we can get Brady too.

That is crazy talk. We have already given up way too many picks in future drafts for the guys we acquired this offseason. Also, too many stud Wrs coming out in 2011 in the college ranks to even want to pursue an aging Moss, or even Welker.

That is crazy talk. We have already given up way too many picks in future drafts for the guys we acquired this offseason. Also, too many stud Wrs coming out in 2011 in the college ranks to even want to pursue an aging Moss, or even Welker.

I dont care how many "studs" there are if NE was dumb enough to take a 3rd or 4th or both for either Moss or Welker, I'd take it in a heartbeat.

A little Mort report sponsored by PFT:

Haynesworth trade market could heat up, again
Posted by Mike Florio on September 13, 2010 9:28 PM ET
With one game in the books and another one six days away, the Redskins reportedly may once again explore the possibility of trading defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth, according to Chris Mortensen of ESPN.

Mort reports that the Redskins "could try" to trade Haynesworth through Tuesday, and that the Titans remain the top potential trade partner.

The price had been a second-round draft pick; Mort believes that the Redskins may take less than that. He says that Haynesworth hasn't learned the Redskins' 3-4 defense and that he doesn't care to learn it.

Meanwhile, coach Mike Shanahan did his best to preserve leverage by projecting a sense that Haynesworth is going nowhere. "We had most of our linemen play between 15 and 30 plays and they rotated," Shanahan said Monday, explaining the limited snaps Haynesworth received on Sunday night against the Cowboys. "We had six lineman up for the game. Talking about Albert, Albert played hard. He's getting more comfortable with the 3-4 scheme every time he takes a rep. Hopefully, he keeps on getting better and better, but he did play extremely hard."

Possible translation? "If you trade for him, you won't be getting a head case who only plays hard when he's chasing a pot of gold."

AH isn't dominant in the 3-4, and my guess is he doesn't much care. We should find a way to trade him IMO, but we should not give him away either. What's the trade deadline? There's a dominant 4-3 DT bound to go down to injury at some pt...

AH isn't dominant in the 3-4, and my guess is he doesn't much care. We should find a way to trade him IMO, but we should not give him away either. What's the trade deadline? There's a dominant 4-3 DT bound to go down to injury at some pt...


Shouldn't we trade Landry first since he is a bust?

AH isn't dominant in the 3-4, and my guess is he doesn't much care. We should find a way to trade him IMO, but we should not give him away either. What's the trade deadline? There's a dominant 4-3 DT bound to go down to injury at some pt...

What pisses me off is that Kris Jenkins was a dominant 4-3 DT in Carolina, On the Jets he's a dominant 3-4 NT/DE so WTF Albert stop being a bitch.

If we trade AH I would hope to get a player in return that can help this team now.. Maybe Britt hell Tenn doesn't throw the ball anyway

YouTube - Lamb chops play-Along (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNTxr2NJHa0)

I know for a fact that our run D was significantly better with Haynesworth playing last year. Someone did the math and it cannot be argued. So my first suggestion would be to put him on the field full-time.

You can put this Dip Shit ( AH) on the field but if he doesn't know his assignment or won't do his assignment he just hurts the defense. I want AH to be a Redskin but does he truly in his heart won't to be here? It does not appear like he wants to be here by the way he stood by himself when the defense was on the sideline in a huddle.