artmonkforhallofamein07
09-06-2010, 12:20 PM
4yrs 46 million, 32 mil guarenteed.
This deal is also up when he turns 28, setting him up to make more money.
This deal is also up when he turns 28, setting him up to make more money.
Sources: Revis and Jets Agree on a dealartmonkforhallofamein07 09-06-2010, 12:20 PM 4yrs 46 million, 32 mil guarenteed. This deal is also up when he turns 28, setting him up to make more money. NYCskinfan82 09-06-2010, 12:25 PM He gave in the jets won. 32 mil guaranted is good money but I think he held out expecting more. chrishanburgerHOF 09-06-2010, 01:04 PM He didn't get top dollar, but he's making more than the back-up qb. Bottom line, Jets are Sb contenders now. They weren't yesterday. CRedskinsRule 09-06-2010, 01:56 PM He didn't get top dollar, but he's making more than the back-up qb. Bottom line, Jets are Sb contenders now. They weren't yesterday. Let's see how their offense does before we are putting them up as SB contenders. I think they will have to win most of their games 10-7 or something like that. Lotus 09-06-2010, 02:24 PM Not sure you can write it off as the Jets "caving". It's not like he got a ridiculous Nnamdi Asomugha type of deal he was looking for initially. Seems like a good deal for both sides. This. jsarno 09-06-2010, 05:42 PM Really can't stand when these athletes hold the teams hostage. People say well teams will cut people at will...well yes, and no. Most players have guaranteed money, so they get paid regardless, but why is it these players are not forced to honor their contracts? They willingly signed a contract for whatever figure, they should not hold a team hostage because they performed well for a year. Aren't they supposed to play well anyway? Ruhskins 09-06-2010, 05:44 PM Really can't stand when these athletes hold the teams hostage. People say well teams will cut people at will...well yes, and no. Most players have guaranteed money, so they get paid regardless, but why is it these players are not forced to honor their contracts? They willingly signed a contract for whatever figure, they should not hold a team hostage because they performed well for a year. Aren't they supposed to play well anyway? No offense but teams are no saints either and at many times they don't honor their part of the contract. Teams would gladly get talent for cheap. jsarno 09-06-2010, 05:57 PM No offense but teams are no saints either and at many times they don't honor their part of the contract. Teams would gladly get talent for cheap. What do you mean they don't honor their part of the contract? Of course they do...they are required to. There are certainly stipulations in every contract about cutting a player. They are within their right to cut a player, and don't forget, it costs them money to cut someone in almost all cases. Other than cutting a player how would they not honor their part of the contract? (ps- players usually get cut because they are not performing to the level of money they are getting in a contract) Ruhskins 09-06-2010, 06:06 PM What do you mean they don't honor their part of the contract? Of course they do...they are required to. There are certainly stipulations in every contract about cutting a player. They are within their right to cut a player, and don't forget, it costs them money to cut someone in almost all cases. Other than cutting a player how would they not honor their part of the contract? (ps- players usually get cut because they are not performing to the level of money they are getting in a contract) It's funny that you mention performance, sometimes players are not paid at the level of performance they are playing too. I hear what you're saying, it's just that fans always sides with the team in these situations. tootergray34 09-06-2010, 06:06 PM glad he got paid |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum