SBXVII
09-21-2010, 02:34 PM
OK..I'll man up
Would the Giants take Haynesworth at a reasonable price and be suitable for what they would want to do as they currently run a 4-3 Defense...and have they shown interest in him before? yes
Would I want the Redskins to actually make the trade to a divisional opponent,only to watch him stuff our already weak running game and watch another redskins player move on for success like many before him....and regret trading him like the eagles will by the end of the season trading McNabb to the Redskins? No
I guess if that means I need to man up Lotus,then there you have it bud!:food-smil
I've manned up...
I wouldn't have a problem with this.....
All we have to do is keep Fat Al on the field longer then 9 plays and he is either a non factor or he lays on the field then takes a play off. So the strategy would be to pass, pass, pass/ pass, pass, run(AH is tired)/ run(AH is tired), run(AH on sideline), pass/ pass, run(AH is tired), pass. lol.
Would the Giants take Haynesworth at a reasonable price and be suitable for what they would want to do as they currently run a 4-3 Defense...and have they shown interest in him before? yes
Would I want the Redskins to actually make the trade to a divisional opponent,only to watch him stuff our already weak running game and watch another redskins player move on for success like many before him....and regret trading him like the eagles will by the end of the season trading McNabb to the Redskins? No
I guess if that means I need to man up Lotus,then there you have it bud!:food-smil
I've manned up...
I wouldn't have a problem with this.....
All we have to do is keep Fat Al on the field longer then 9 plays and he is either a non factor or he lays on the field then takes a play off. So the strategy would be to pass, pass, pass/ pass, pass, run(AH is tired)/ run(AH is tired), run(AH on sideline), pass/ pass, run(AH is tired), pass. lol.