|
skinsfaninok 09-06-2010, 05:56 PM you would take Vj over Wes Welker...........the wes welker with over 120 catches in a season. That Welker..........
Who gives a shit where he lines up. That doesn't matter. He catches the ball. Period!
Never said I would take VJ over Welker, I was just saying VJ has put up Pro Bowl numbers as a Number 1 for 2-3 years now, Welker catches alot of 5 yard passes, plus he has Randy Moss as the Number 1
skinsfaninok 09-06-2010, 05:57 PM Hey we all can argue but at the end of the day I see us sticking with our WR group that we have. Screw VJ, Ocho, Ward! Their not Redskins lol
saden1 09-06-2010, 05:58 PM Holmes isn't better than Jackson man. How would you take a career number 2 over a Stud number 1?
He was number #1 play maker for the Steelers last year.
GTripp0012 09-06-2010, 06:01 PM Jackson is 28 next January....he ain't no spring chicken and he's certainly not worth the kind of money he's asking for. When these players take over I'll be happy to reevaluate my position.No, he's not young-young, but he's also in the same class as, without the same dropoff risk of, guys like Moss and Steve Smith.
skinsfaninok 09-06-2010, 06:02 PM No doubt, both had really good years.
Dirtbag59 09-06-2010, 06:08 PM ^ Austin and Rice have had one good season. VJ has been really good for 2-3 years now.
Yeah, but the thing is Austin and Rice passed the 1,300 yard mark. Once a player makes it to that point you know theres something else besides QB play at work. Only player I can think of that struggled after getting 1,300 yards was Javon Walker and that was thanks to injury.
1. Andre Johnson
2. Larry Fitzgerald
3. Randy Moss
4. Calvin Johnson (984 yards in 14 games last year with a rookie QB, 1,300 yards the year before)
5a. Wes Welker (More yards then Moss but 9 fewer TD's)
5b. Roddy White (Got 1,200 yards with one of the worst QB groups in the league in 2007)
7. Reggie Wayne
8. Anquan Boldin
9. Brandon Marshall
10. Miles Austin
On top of that VJax isn't even the best receiver on his own team. I'm all for bringing him in at a discount but AJ Smith is all so stubborn.
saden1 09-06-2010, 06:09 PM If you simply think Jackson is better because he's younger and can get down field better you can have him but to me Johnson is a proven commodity...a pro's pro. And despite missing a game and half and a slow old fart he put on a great show...enjoy:
EVXUMZ6m3GQ
saden1 09-06-2010, 06:11 PM No, he's not young-young, but he's also in the same class as, without the same dropoff risk of, guys like Moss and Steve Smith.
You think him and Rice deserves top 5 money?
GTripp0012 09-06-2010, 06:19 PM You think him and Rice deserves top 5 money?Oh, of course. You give me someone as proven as Jackson (and then to a lesser proven extent, Rice and Austin), and those are your surest bets from an investment perspective. (Rice's injury would hurt his value a bit).
I'm sure they'd compromise and take top ten money, and then both sides would be happy, but the reason that Jackson is such a lost man in San Diego is because hes a FA next offseason, and he's already suspended for 3+ weeks. That's not valuable to them, but it's very valuable to other teams. I don't blame SD at all for holding him until they get an offer they like.
But now, they pretty much just have two suitors for him: us and Seattle. That lowers the trade compensation substantially.
saden1 09-06-2010, 06:28 PM Oh, of course. You give me someone as proven as Jackson (and then to a lesser proven extent, Rice and Austin), and those are your surest bets from an investment perspective. (Rice's injury would hurt his value a bit).
I'm sure they'd compromise and take top ten money, and then both sides would be happy, but the reason that Jackson is such a lost man in San Diego is because hes a FA next offseason, and he's already suspended for 3+ weeks. That's not valuable to them, but it's very valuable to other teams. I don't blame SD at all for holding him until they get an offer they like.
But now, they pretty much just have two suitors for him: us and Seattle. That lowers the trade compensation substantially.
Give me your top 5.
|