Expose on the Tea Party Architects

I agree...let the scholarly constitutional debates begin!

Maybe she could debate her.

YouTube - Corrine Brown - Go Gata (with Subtitles)

So Chris Coons didnt write a paper about him become a Marxist in college?

Like our current Govenor and his college thesis voicing his opinion about women?

My man, grain of salt with both...its a stretch when trying to compare those examples to a nut case who experimented in Satanic ritual...

Like our current Govenor and his college thesis voicing his opinion about women?

My man, grain of salt with both...its a stretch when trying to compare those examples to a nut case who experimented in Satanic ritual...
Better that than an x KKK member like the beloved Byrd.

For someone with my political views, I'd be in a real pickle about O'Donnell. On the one hand, she's a certifiable wack-job with her literal biblical views about lust and such. In any other race, I would dismiss holy rolling thumpers like her without a blink.

On the other hand, if her goals with regard to economic policy are to stand in opposition to the continued feeding of this unbelievably massive leviathon that is the United State Federal Government, I'd have to hold my nose and vote for her.

But then again, she's all for the wars and apparently sees Iran as a threat that must be dealt with militarily. And as I've said over and over -- if you're a Tea Party member, and you want an end to the economic suicide of this country, you have to call for an end to fighting wars that we cannot afford.

For someone with my political views, I'd be in a real pickle about O'Donnell. On the one hand, she's a certifiable wack-job with her literal biblical views about lust and such. In any other race, I would dismiss holy rolling thumpers like her without a blink.

On the other hand, if her goals with regard to economic policy are to stand in opposition to the continued feeding of this unbelievably massive leviathon that is the United State Federal Government, I'd have to hold my nose and vote for her.

But then again, she's all for the wars and apparently sees Iran as a threat that must be dealt with militarily. And as I've said over and over -- if you're a Tea Party member, and you want an end to the economic suicide of this country, you have to call for an end to fighting wars that we cannot afford.


So you would vote for her? Would not vote for her? Blow your own head off in frustration? Decisions Decisions...they are tough to make.

A picture is worth a thousand words, this one is worth 5 trillion:

http://crooksandliars.com/files/vfs/2010/09/bush%20belly%20sneeches%20before%20and%20after.jpg

HMMM, Looks like Cuomo has lost his 23 point lead for govoner to Carl Paladino in just over a few weeks. That dam Tea Party.

Democrat Cuomo narrowly leads NY governor's race | Reuters (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68L2LG20100922)

I don't have time to follow idiots so I don't follow politics. It's mostly showboating.

But the group from Delaware should be renamed the Mad Hatter Party.

I feel disenfranchised with both parties. I used to be a republican, but they got "religion" and I couldn't stomach it any more. On the other hand, (among other things), the Democrats do a whole bunch of complaining about health care costs leading to health care reform, but do nothing (and never will do anything) about malpractice reform. At least the Republicans feel as though they MIGHT do something about it. I haven't voted for a long time because there hasn't been a candidate I believed in.

The real criminal in all this is Pat Buchanon. There was a third party (mostly in the middle) that was started by Ross Perot that was getting traction. While Ross Perot was not a good candidate for the presidency, the party seemed to be viable and was forcing the other parties to be more reasonable (i.e. look for a middle ground.) Then Pat Buchanon found a way to manipulate it so that he would be their presidential candidate and succeeded in destroying the party.

I would love it if the parties allowed some leeway to their members to vote as they felt. I thought that the people in Congress were voted there to represent their constituents on the issues, and not to represent their party affiliation. Until the parties stop flexing their "political muscle" on their own members of Congress, I do not see any way we can get a satisfactory government.

Classy dude

Carl Paladino's Controversial Statements Could Embarrass Republicans - Political Hotsheet - CBS News (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20016461-503544.html)

This thread makes me miss Trample.