Unofficial depth chart is out

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5

GhettoDogAllStars
08-09-2010, 06:23 PM
I read an opinion piece (can't remember where) basically saying that Parker won't be on the roster opening day. He's getting fewer reps in camp than Torain.

With the exception of WR, our depth chart doesn't look too bad.

Lotus
08-09-2010, 06:51 PM
Torrain is 3rd RB in front of Parker...thats a bit suprising this early

Golston a starter over Daniels is interesting too...Daniels is a beast...perhaps they are thinking age...to transition him to the primary bench guy...I just dont buy it though...daniels is still better than golston.

Not suprised by Tryon being 4th string...but Barnes aint there in coverage yet.
Perhaps putting Tryon at 4th has something to do with that article about him being a breakout player....for all we know he got a big head about it or something...he's got to be better than Ramzee Robinson...I mean...c'mon! He's not great, but he doesn't suck that bad

Shanny was ready to start Torain in Denver before Torain got hurt. He's been under the radar but that won't last.

SkinzWin
08-09-2010, 07:56 PM
Can we please get Vincent Jackson? Who cares give up a 1st or 2nd

I care if we give up a 1st or 2nd round pick. We NEED to stop doing that! I read an article saying they are looking at Fred Davis in the slot sometimes and that it has been working well. Everyone has been saying Davis has been the most dynamic player in camp. They have to find him somewhere to get on the field with Cooley in front of him. I would much rather stay put than give up that much for Jackson. However, Galloway at the #2 receiver position at age 103 is not promising.

GusFrerotte
08-09-2010, 09:24 PM
I care if we give up a 1st or 2nd round pick. We NEED to stop doing that! I read an article saying they are looking at Fred Davis in the slot sometimes and that it has been working well. Everyone has been saying Davis has been the most dynamic player in camp. They have to find him somewhere to get on the field with Cooley in front of him. I would much rather stay put than give up that much for Jackson. However, Galloway at the #2 receiver position at age 103 is not promising.


Yeah, we need our top picks to continue to build the o line and the defensive backfield. If Thomas and Kelly are flops this year it means one thing, and that is the scouting staff under Gibbs/Zorn sucked balls. Also we need to quit wasting picks on positions that are already shored up like TE. Why we drafted a TE this past draft boggles my mind. It is like when Gibbs(Vinny) drafted 3 RBs when we already had CP, Betts, and Rock. Use any damn pick for urgent needs, not try to fool around with some gimmick experiment. Galloway at #2 at this point isn't very good at all.

artmonkforhallofamein07
08-09-2010, 09:35 PM
I am with Smoot. I just don't put much stock in the depth chart this early in camp.

I also would not like to see us trading away high draft picks for a WR who is about to be suspended.

GusFrerotte
08-09-2010, 09:49 PM
Can we please get Vincent Jackson? Who cares give up a 1st or 2nd


Too much for him. One WR isn't going to do it anyway if the youngsters can't cut it. The top priority is still the O line and I would say the defensive backfield and LBs.

Lotus
08-09-2010, 10:01 PM
None of our quarterbacks have practiced on a slip-and-slide, so there's no hope anyway.

skinsfaninok
08-09-2010, 10:11 PM
Too much for him. One WR isn't going to do it anyway if the youngsters can't cut it. The top priority is still the O line and I would say the defensive backfield and LBs.

Jackson would be a huge upgrade.. He's big, fast and is a mismatch for almost any DB. San Diego won't let him go anyway, but it would be nice to get him.

Imagine: 1. Jackson 2. Moss 3. Galloway/Thomas... plus CC/FD
that would be nice.

GusFrerotte
08-09-2010, 10:24 PM
I agree Okie, but we have way too many holes to fill than to give up two top picks for him. We will be losing Moss to aging soon, and if the newbies can't cut the mustard you are then stuck with one functional WR again. We need safeties, and a LB on D, and of course the big project, the O line.

skinsfaninok
08-09-2010, 10:32 PM
I agree Okie, but we have way too many holes to fill than to give up two top picks for him. We will be losing Moss to aging soon, and if the newbies can't cut the mustard you are then stuck with one functional WR again. We need safeties, and a LB on D, and of course the big project, the O line.

No doubt, we both agree with each other lol.. I just hope Thomas steps up and can become a legit player for us

I like our Safeties though.. Lendy Holmes may surprise in these preseason games

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum