NFL Players Weigh In On Haynesworth Situation

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

MTK
06-25-2010, 12:47 PM
Smith had some leg issues last year. Could have something to do with him not being brought back. Someone will probably sign him before or during camp.

artmonkforhallofamein07
06-25-2010, 12:47 PM
Thanks Smoot.

To follow up on Question #1s answer.

1. Are they paid at all during OTA's, Work Out Days, and Mini Camps?

artmonkforhallofamein07
06-25-2010, 12:49 PM
I doubt Big Al became selfish and above it all overnight. I guess its something the Skins thought they could change or live with but obviously they cant. Of course in retrospect they should have never signed this bum in the first place so all we can hope for now is that the new regime will focus signing guys that want to be in DC for more than a payday.

It would seem that the second part of your post is already coming to pass.

We didn't give out any big time contracts as of yet. I would really like to see Donovan Extended soon as well as Jamaal Brown.

jdlea
06-25-2010, 01:08 PM
I will say that I heard Amani Toomer talk about this issue on Sirius NFL Radio and he seemed to be on Haynesworth side. Saying something like, "He's unhappy and that happens, teams can cut us whenever they want, why can't he withhold his services?"

It was something to that effect, but I was surprised to hear that from a guy like Amani

MTK
06-25-2010, 01:09 PM
At this point any defense of AH rings hollow to me. I just can't get behind that line of thinking.

SmootSmack
06-25-2010, 01:17 PM
Thanks Smoot.

To follow up on Question #1s answer.

1. Are they paid at all during OTA's, Work Out Days, and Mini Camps?

If they show up, yes. But it's basically a stipend to cover basic expenses

Longtimefan
06-25-2010, 01:53 PM
And it continues...

Ex-wife: 'Entitled' Albert Haynesworth 'thinks he's above everything' - The Huddle: Football News from the NFL - USATODAY.com (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2010/06/ex-wife-entitled-albert-haynesworth-thinks-hes-above-everything/1)

When it rain's it pours

BigHairedAristocrat
06-25-2010, 02:07 PM
At this point any defense of AH rings hollow to me. I just can't get behind that line of thinking.

I'm with you there. Mike Wilbon echoed Thomas' argument defending Haynesworth on PTI a few weeks ago. The thing that drives me crazy about that argument is that there is no language in player's contracts garaunteeing them that the system will not change for the duration of the contract. None whatsoever. However, there is wording in the contract that obligates him to, among other things, show up for mandatory activities.

Sure, Haynesworth might have been enticed to the Redskins because they ran a 4-3. He might have even been told that he'd be used a certain way. If so, I'm sure no one was out to decieve him. As others have said, hings change. It's a reality of the NFL. Sure, Haynesworth might be disappointed or disgruntled that things didnt work out as he envisioned, but lets get real for a second...

Before Haynesworth CHOSE to become a Washington Redskin, he knew that Jim Zorn, widely reguarded as a complete joke of a head coach, was in the hot seat. He knew, or should have known as it was widely rumored, that Cerrato if things didnt turn around after year two, he was out as well. Further, Blache had been flirting with retirement for several years, so Haynesworth should have taken his possible departure into account as well.

So lets, recap, shall wel? Haynesworth new, coming in, that it was possible, if not likely, that the "GM," Head Coach, and possibly the Defensive Coordinator would be canned after his first year with the team, yet he chose to sign with us anyway, amidst all that uncertainty. If you remember, there were 4 teams reported to be actively interested in Haynesworth - the Titans, Giants, Bucs, and Redskins. Those first two teams have far more stable coaching staffs. If it was so important to him that he stick with a 4-3 defense, why not go to either of them? Oh, I forgot, because neither of them came close to meeting his financial demands. So he chose the Redskins. Because, as much uncertainty surrounded the team, they were willing to pay the most.

So what does Haynesworth do when he finds out the teams switching to a 3-4? He talks to Shanahan and Shanahan tells him they'll RELEASE him so he can go wherever he wants to, as long as he doesnt take a 21 million dollar check from the team. Instead of taking them up on the offer, he takes the money, and THEN demands to be traded or released. Haynesworth is nothing but a greedy scumbag. The only people who take his side in this matter are also greedy scumbags. Haynesworth can think what he wants, but no one is ever, EVER going to give him a big payday again. He's dug his own grave. If he leaves here, the most he'll ever see from another team is short-term, performance-based contracts. Good luck with that.

artmonkforhallofamein07
06-25-2010, 02:08 PM
If they show up, yes. But it's basically a stipend to cover basic expenses

Perfect. Thanks for all the info. I always wondered how these guys collected checks and how they were compensated during the offseason if they were at all.

Longtimefan
06-25-2010, 02:16 PM
People who live in glass houses' themselves should save their stones. A lot of perfect people weighing in on the Haynesworth situation. (sarcasm)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum