We Asked, Matt Bowen Answered

What did you guys think was the most surprising answer? I think for me I hadn't really thought about how so many players on the roster play special teams and how that makes Danny Smith an extremely important coach on the staff. I often think of special teams coaches as lower on the totem pole below the head coach, coordinators, and even some position coaches. But that's not the case it seems.This is the first time I've tried to word this, but I guess I kind of think that a lot of what offensive coaches spend time on, when compared to what defensive and special teams coaches do, is academic. That means that the preparation factor means so much more for the whole defensive and special teams unit, and while the offense absolutely has to be able to communicate and recognize things at this level (and coaches assist in that process), offensive systems all seem to be basically effective when you have the right talent, and ineffective when you don't.

That much is true of all units, I think. But, I guess what I'm saying is that offensive coaches could probably cut the work they do by 50% and still get similar if not identical results, whereas defensive coaches and special teams coaches almost need more time than they actually have to get the best results.

What did you guys think was the most surprising answer? I think for me I hadn't really thought about how so many players on the roster play special teams and how that makes Danny Smith an extremely important coach on the staff. I often think of special teams coaches as lower on the totem pole below the head coach, coordinators, and even some position coaches. But that's not the case it seems.

I thought what he said about Blache was the most surprising also.Good job SS

Thanks Matt as usual. Wish my question had been answered but since it involved lower coaches I was pretty sure he'd not had the experience with them to answer some. Thanks again Mr. Bowen, glad to see you still showing some Skins pride though we couldn't do much while you were on board.

^ There are many reasons to criticize Blache: lack of creativity, playing people in odd positions, not putting every player in the ultimate position to succeed, etc. I will not defend Blache from such charges.

However, when all was said and done, his defenses ranked highly. He put good defenses on the field. And that was his job. Whether or not Bowen is biased towards Blache, there are solid reasons to think favorably about him.

I agree, there were many things that kept the Redskins mediocre the past years. The defense was normally not the problem.

Good read, I just disagree on the whole Blache thing, but hey, can't agree on everything!