offiss
11-12-2004, 07:00 PM
This is a live chat on the Washington Post.com........
Richmond, Va.: There are some comments out there from Bugel that Ramsey may be dogging it in practice or "not showing" anything. Have you heard anything like that? And if so, I thought the back-up only ran the scout team offense and had minimal to no snaps with the 1st team offense. How are you expected to thrive in that situation? Thanks.
Jason LaCanfora: I heard rumblings this week that Joe Bugel may have said something like that in a TV interview, but Ramsey real has no chance to show much given how few snaps he takes. He has been nothing but a modal citizen from what we can garner and Gibbs has raved about him. I also asked Gibbs this exact questiuon last Friday, wondering if there are things Patrick can still do in this limited role to show he has a better grasp of the offense than before, and Gibbs said he is in fact doing exactyl that, practicing hard, never complains, asks good questions of the coaches and Brunell, etc.
Now, I also know that Coach Bugel can be a lot more direct and brutally honest than Coach Gibbs tends to be, so there may be something to it, but if they thought Ramsey could give them a better chance to win no matter how bad he looked with the scout team, there is no doubt in my mind he would play. I think this issue is much larger than that and coems down to Brunell being a veteran and played very careful football taking no chances with turnovers. Even if he complets under 10 passes a game, Gibbs knows the D can keep it close and Portis can grind teams down. The fear is Ramsey makes a great play and then throws two big picks; they want consistnecy, even if it is consistently unproductive but does not result in turnovers, it seems.
That may be true but I don't think it's smart, 1st everyone keep's harping on turnover's as if Brunell doesn't turn the ball over, when in fact he has given up 28 point's off of turnover's which directly cost us at least 2 games, which is much worse than anything Ramsey has done, the fact is anyone of us could go out there and not turn the ball over, we won't move the ball either, and that's Brunell in a nut shell, we paid 43 mil. for a QB not to turn the ball over his play does not factor in the equation, it's the bird afraid of walking that never learn's to fly, IMO Brunell is hanging on to his job through lack of effort, in other word's by not moving the ball he minimizes the chances for a turnover so why take a chance? I am sorry but there is a reason the QB is the highest paid position in the NFL he is paid to win, not to not lose, the fact that Brunell is reduced to a QB that is expected just to not lose a game is an indictment in itself on his talent and the confidence of the coach in him as a winner, and defiently not the kind of player you give 43 mil. to.
I say let the bird who's not afraid to walk learn to fly! And that's Ramsey!
Richmond, Va.: There are some comments out there from Bugel that Ramsey may be dogging it in practice or "not showing" anything. Have you heard anything like that? And if so, I thought the back-up only ran the scout team offense and had minimal to no snaps with the 1st team offense. How are you expected to thrive in that situation? Thanks.
Jason LaCanfora: I heard rumblings this week that Joe Bugel may have said something like that in a TV interview, but Ramsey real has no chance to show much given how few snaps he takes. He has been nothing but a modal citizen from what we can garner and Gibbs has raved about him. I also asked Gibbs this exact questiuon last Friday, wondering if there are things Patrick can still do in this limited role to show he has a better grasp of the offense than before, and Gibbs said he is in fact doing exactyl that, practicing hard, never complains, asks good questions of the coaches and Brunell, etc.
Now, I also know that Coach Bugel can be a lot more direct and brutally honest than Coach Gibbs tends to be, so there may be something to it, but if they thought Ramsey could give them a better chance to win no matter how bad he looked with the scout team, there is no doubt in my mind he would play. I think this issue is much larger than that and coems down to Brunell being a veteran and played very careful football taking no chances with turnovers. Even if he complets under 10 passes a game, Gibbs knows the D can keep it close and Portis can grind teams down. The fear is Ramsey makes a great play and then throws two big picks; they want consistnecy, even if it is consistently unproductive but does not result in turnovers, it seems.
That may be true but I don't think it's smart, 1st everyone keep's harping on turnover's as if Brunell doesn't turn the ball over, when in fact he has given up 28 point's off of turnover's which directly cost us at least 2 games, which is much worse than anything Ramsey has done, the fact is anyone of us could go out there and not turn the ball over, we won't move the ball either, and that's Brunell in a nut shell, we paid 43 mil. for a QB not to turn the ball over his play does not factor in the equation, it's the bird afraid of walking that never learn's to fly, IMO Brunell is hanging on to his job through lack of effort, in other word's by not moving the ball he minimizes the chances for a turnover so why take a chance? I am sorry but there is a reason the QB is the highest paid position in the NFL he is paid to win, not to not lose, the fact that Brunell is reduced to a QB that is expected just to not lose a game is an indictment in itself on his talent and the confidence of the coach in him as a winner, and defiently not the kind of player you give 43 mil. to.
I say let the bird who's not afraid to walk learn to fly! And that's Ramsey!