The Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread: Rounds 4-7

did NFLN just say Oakland traded their LB Morrison?

at that point, keep him. mcnabb, campbell, grossman makes for solid qb depth

whats everyone smokin today?

i love all the hate for riley ten minutes after we get him so many haters, they obviously see somthing in the kid atleast wait until preseason to bash him

seriously! We Skins fans have been trained to gripe about anything that is not OLine.

whats everyone smokin today?

nothing yet, talk to me later

i love how everyone on here thinks bruce campbell is such an amazing prospect. the guy is yet another project lineman from md. how well has that worked out for us?The difference is that Campbell has first round speed/agility/athletic ability. You can't coach that, you're born with it. Speaking of project O-linemen, one with adequate size and off the charts athletic ability (Campbell) has a far greater chance to be an impact player than a guy with just size and average athletic ability (Heyer).

Perry Riley will probably be HB Blades - decent backup but lacking as a starter. We had a chance to nail bookend OTs for the next 5+ years ... We blew this one.

so. Jaguars got morrison and oaklands 5th round pick for their 4th rounder.

Ok, i wouldn't have minded us making that deal...

The difference is that Campbell has first round speed/agility/athletic ability. You can't coach that, you're born with it. Speaking of project O-linemen, one with adequate size and off the charts athletic ability (Campbell) has a far greater chance to be an impact player than a guy with just size and average athletic ability (Heyer).

Perry Riley will probably be HB Blades - decent backup but lacking as a starter. We had a chance to nail bookend OTs for the next 5+ years ... We blew this one.

I don't think we blew this. There's a reason Campbell dropped so far. Workout warrior, slighty above average college tackle. Kiper said it will probably be a few years before he has any kind of impact for the Raiders. I'm not saying he won't be a decent player, but to say he would have stepped in right away to give us that "book end" is a stetch IMO.

The difference is that Campbell has first round speed/agility/athletic ability. You can't coach that, you're born with it. Speaking of project O-linemen, one with adequate size and off the charts athletic ability (Campbell) has a far greater chance to be an impact player than a guy with just size and average athletic ability (Heyer).

Perry Riley will probably be HB Blades - decent backup but lacking as a starter. We had a chance to nail bookend OTs for the next 5+ years ... We blew this one.

I struggle with love for a pick that was passed over several times, projected as a 4th/5th rounder before the combine, and then selected in the 4th round as originally projected. Maybe it will pan out, but just having the ability doesn't make someone a first rounder, in fact I would think just the opposite, if he has all the ability in the world, and can't get it right in college, the chance of "getting it right" in the NFL is less likely.

I'm not a huge fan of the Perry Riley pick. We needed an ILB, but I think Riley was a big reach and he probably would've still been available at 163. I think there was too much quality still left on the board for us to reach with Riley.

I don't think we blew this. There's a reason Campbell dropped so far. Workout warrior, slighty above average college tackle. Kiper said it will probably be a few years before he has any kind of impact for the Raiders. I'm not saying he won't be a decent player, but to say he would have stepped in right away to give us that "book end" is a stetch IMO.I agree that Campbell would have been a project, but a very athletic one at that. My choice of words was poor, saying he could have given us bookend OT's for the NEXT 5+ years. I should have said 5+ years once he established himself. Perhaps the Riley pick is intended to light a fire under Rocky. Competition is always a good thing.