AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

HERE is what I wrote the other day. Now it is coming true as the media experts are beginning to backtrack and use the old excuse " oh teams are just cautious because of what they're hearing".

yea, and if Bradford doesn't go number 1 then they can say "oh, teams were just worried about his shoulder".

Settle down people. These idiots in the media are payed good money to start rumors and start trouble. Its their life. Its all they do.
It's a good thing that you're here to herd all of us sheep

Why? Because he spoke out against the terrible coaching staff we had last year? Or because he wants to play a position where he fits the best? Really, are people that blind to want to bitch and whine about a particular player and miss the big picture completely?

Aren't we the same fanbase that bitches about Landry playing out of position? Or bitched about not playing Orakpo as a 4-3 DE? :doh:

I thought I was the only one that felt that way.

honestly, haynesworth is a prototypical 3-4 defensive end.. so there is a difference. he has the ability. he just lacks the desire.

It is sounding more and more likely that Detroit will take Suh. That would eliminate the Haynesworth to the Lions for their 2nd rd pick.
If the Saints make that trade, it would have to be before the Skins select their choice. If Jammal Brown comes here, and Suh/Mcoy are both gone, then we would get Berry.
No trade by 8pm thursday night, my guess is we would select Okung.

honestly, haynesworth is a prototypical 3-4 defensive end.. so there is a difference. he has the ability. he just lacks the desire.
And, hey, he seems perfectly onboard to play 3-4 DE, based on what he said on the radio today: "End in 3-4 is the same thing as a defensive tackle in the 4-3, I believe."

On Albert Haynesworth And The Nose Tackle Position (http://blog.redskins.com/2010/03/22/on-albert-haynesworth-and-the-nose-tackle-position/)

He's fine with DE, he just doesn't want to play NT much.

Why? Because he spoke out against the terrible coaching staff we had last year? Or because he wants to play a position where he fits the best? Really, are people that blind to want to bitch and whine about a particular player and miss the big picture completely?

Aren't we the same fanbase that bitches about Landry playing out of position? Or bitched about not playing Orakpo as a 4-3 DE? :doh:

Go man. Go.
I am glad to see we agree on this.
I have been staying away from this site before the draft and also avoiding the fictional BS articles about Haynesworth. It pains me to read misquotes or fictional made up shit that Haynesworth supposedly feels or said. It is a huge over reaction of people to call AH a cancer. What a joke.
It is ok to hate that we paid him that much money, but that is not AH's fault.
Would you tell your employer that you are paid too much? Would you not seek to maximize your salary?
AH along with Orakpo will make our defensive front 7 and our pass rush very strong. Lets not fall in to the same Dan Snyder trap of trying to build a superbowl team in one offseason. We have a solid defense. Great. Start with that and we build our offense over time. Don't dismantle our strength for draft picks that may never pan out. Otherwise we back to Cerratto ball.

Go man. Go.
I am glad to see we agree on this.
I have been staying away from this site before the draft and also avoiding the fictional BS articles about Haynesworth. It pains me to read misquotes or fictional made up shit that Haynesworth supposedly feels or said. It is a huge over reaction of people to call AH a cancer. What a joke.
It is ok to hate that we paid him that much money, but that is not AH's fault.
Would you tell your employer that you are paid too much? Would you not seek to maximize your salary?
AH along with Orakpo will make our defensive front 7 and our pass rush very strong. Lets not fall in to the same Dan Snyder trap of trying to build a superbowl team in one offseason. We have a solid defense. Great. Start with that and we build our offense over time. Don't dismantle our strength for draft picks that may never pan out. Otherwise we back to Cerratto ball.



AGREED COMPLETELY. He's not at the voluntary workout, but he's preparing and working hard on his own. It's not like he's being lazy.

Cancer? Sure...this "cancer" doubled our sack total last year. He's worth keeping.

On Albert Haynesworth And The Nose Tackle Position (http://blog.redskins.com/2010/03/22/on-albert-haynesworth-and-the-nose-tackle-position/)

He's fine with DE, he just doesn't want to play NT much.

yeah, but Shanahan has publically named Haynesworth the teams starting NT and said that, while he'll be moved around, he will play NT as well. In my opinion, the skins are obviously trying to isolate Haynesworth. I think the desire for the two parties to split is very mutual.

AGREED COMPLETELY. He's not at the voluntary workout, but he's preparing and working hard on his own. It's not like he's being lazy.

Cancer? Sure...this "cancer" doubled our sack total last year. He's worth keeping.

who gives a crap about voluntary workouts? the crucial things is he skipped a minicamp. Shanahan's first minicamp. Hasletts first minicamp. Haynesworth first opportunity to learn and get practice in the new defense. THAT's what i'm concerned about. Or what I would be concerned about if I felt Haynesworth were going to be part of the team this year. Its time for people to stop whining and recognize the fact that Haynesworth will be wearing another uniform in 2010.

I liked what Jason Reid's latest post said. Paraphrasing, "Veterans expressed concern that Haynesworth could become a distraction if he remains on the team".

What? Do they feel the same way about Rocky and JC? Did they feel the same way about Daniels, Springs, Fletcher, Portis and everybody else who has trained on their own in the offseason before?

In theory, couldn't any player on the team become a distraction?

You know why it is a distraction, because every stupid reporter asks every Redskin player and coach 6 questions about Haynesworth every time they meet with them.