johno
04-19-2010, 08:01 AM
So is Haynesworth's retention a smokescreen or are the trade bait rumors the smokescreen?
us taking a qb at 4 is the smokescreen i was calling out. i also think that haynesworth will be retained because we wont get enough value for him from anyone.
SmootSmack
04-19-2010, 08:32 AM
Does this assume 1) Okung is falling to 4 and 2) nobody will be willing to trade up to get him?
Yes and yes
CrustyRedskin
04-19-2010, 09:52 AM
Noooo i just looked at Eric Berry highlights on utube and im sold lets pick him!!!! We dont need an o-lineman!!!!
backrow
04-19-2010, 10:14 AM
I don't know where they will have room for all of our potential draft picks.
I read where the team had 75 guys at our "Voluntary Mini-Camp". :joke:
This close to the draft every word coming from teams should be considered a smokescreen
CRedskinsRule
04-19-2010, 10:27 AM
Matt Terl redskinsblog
I like this: "Washington's Bruce Allen & Mike Shanahan are championship smokescreeners or simply uninformative." From @SI_PeterKIng's MMQB.
redsk1
04-19-2010, 10:40 AM
The Skins FO has done a good job of giving no hints as to what in the world they are going to do at 4. I hope we have some major trade options available.
PFT: Smokescreen.
hooskins
04-19-2010, 10:47 AM
Like PFT says, if Bradford slips we would probably pick him. But how will that possibly happen?
hooskins
04-19-2010, 10:47 AM
Dont we also have 5 QBs on our current roster.
SmokinSkins
04-19-2010, 10:56 AM
Berry can do it all. Almost all of those 14 interceptions were in his first two years.
Monte then changed the Defense and what Berry's role was. The Vols were paper thin at LB position and Berry played the run his last year. He can lay a nasty hit on you and can tackle in the open field. He will make any defense better in mutiple ways.
We need a big ugly, but passing on Berry will be a historical mistake. He will be a HOF.