47% Will Pay No Federal Income Tax

Patrick Henry, wasn't he the guy who rode on the horse yelling the british are comming, and then after the british landed we had a light for 1th by land and 2th by sea. That was the clue for the tea baggers to hop on their ships and dump their coffee into the black sea. Then the Brits declared war on us and thats what started WWI. I was pretty good in history but I cannot remember how Japan entered the war. Was it that they shot Lincoln?

:lol: Move on over Dmek. There's a new number 1.
he is on his own with the illegals issue. its something that you and i probably slightly agree on

Does this 47% include kids or something to that effect?

LOL this is hilarious. Basically the poor shouldnt get tax relief, is what first is saying.lol, tax cuts baby, you got em.

First wants trickle down economics.

Patrick Henry, wasn't he the guy who rode on the horse yelling the british are comming, and then after the british landed we had a light for 1th by land and 2th by sea. That was the clue for the tea baggers to hop on their ships and dump their coffee into the black sea. Then the Brits declared war on us and thats what started WWI. I was pretty good in history but I cannot remember how Japan entered the war. Was it that they shot Lincoln?


That grammar, even for you, is pathetic. Do you realize you just wrote "firsth" and "secondth?" You are going to give me an aneurysm.

i don't understand, are the 47% not receiving a federal deduction from their paycheck or does it mean that when they file for their return, if they owe money, they don't have to pay it ?

how does someone know if you qualify for this(besides making between x amount of dollers) 16% of people making between 50 and 100 k qualify. how can i find out if i'm one of those 16% ?

That grammar, even for you, is pathetic. Do you realize you just wrote "firsth" and "secondth?" You are going to give me an aneurysm.

he prolly meant IF instead of TH. 1 if by land 2 if by sea.:oink:

I don't always agree with people like CRedskins, GMscud, and FRPLG, but at the end of the day I do respect their ability to cogently present and argue their respective positions. But Firstdown, you are just a headscratcher. 　You are against tax-cuts now? I really question whether you even understand your own political philosophy.

LOL this is hilarious. Basically the poor shouldnt get tax relief, is what first is saying.lol, tax cuts baby, you got em.

First wants trickle down economics.

Trickle down economics is only applicable in a strip club type business model.

I don't always agree with people like CRedskins, GMscud, and FRPLG, but at the end of the day I do respect their ability to cogently present and argue their respective positions. But Firstdown, you are just a headscratcher. 　You are against tax-cuts now? I really question whether you even understand your own political philosophy.

Yeah people try to switch up arguements, but when it comes down to the basic principle of are you keeping more of your money vs is the government keeping more of it, most republicans I know identify former idea. I think the switch up of arguements is do to the fact who is in the office of the President or controlling congress at the time. Im sure if these tax breaks were during Bush's time in office, this thread would be started celebrating this fact.

That's why politicals discussions are just such horsesh*t these days. People are so polarized and not will to give credit when due or admitt when their side is wrong...its really quite funny.