Did Mcnabb open the door for TO?

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

44ever
04-08-2010, 12:18 AM
Will Terrell Owens Follow McNabb To Washington? — BetUS Locker Room (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nfl-football/articles/will-terrel-owens-follow-mcnabb-to-washington-05-04-2010/)
The one player nobody wants to admit that they want!

Would you take consider picking up T.O. considering what a dangerous offensive weapon he and Mcnabb can be?

Mcnabb and T.O. not getting along? From what I see and hear, those days are behind them. T.O./Mcnabb have a great chemistry.
Also, T.O. is the best FA receiver out there.

Can he be a cancer? Yup! would you take the risk?

Would like your input at this point.
I predict T.O. is a Redskin by July! (If he's not a Bengal by then) ;)
edit: removed video due to its "misleading" nature.

hooskins
04-08-2010, 12:23 AM
This is completely misleading. Note the episode was taped a month ago.

Just because you are a part of an episode you get paid to do, doesnt mean you are bbfls with TO.

Daseal
04-08-2010, 12:26 AM
I'll say it. If McNabb and TO buried the hatchet, I'd take him on the skins. While in Buffalo they were constantly trying to bait him and he was the consummate professional. I'm not giving him a huge contract, but if he wants to come in, I'd give him a shot.

TO can be a drama queen. However, he produces, works very hard in the offseason and the weight room, and football is his priority. If we're trying to be competitive quick. He'd be a decent cheap signing for a group I consider pretty weak.

hooskins
04-08-2010, 12:26 AM
Furthermore, if for some strange reason we get TO, it wouldnt be because of crappy show they worked on a month ago.

Also, getting McNabb makes much more sense than TO. We all know QB was a long term need over WR.

Like Joseph Smith, this is dum dum dum dum dummm.

44ever
04-08-2010, 12:35 AM
This is completely misleading. Note the episode was taped a month ago.

Just because you are a part of an episode you get paid to do, doesnt mean you are bbfls with TO.

Im not going to defend the thread so I'll say this one time. The hoops video has nothing to do with the reason why I think Mcnabb/TO share chemistry. Its in no way misleading. Just interesting.

BTW... You get paid to play in the NFL too, last I heard!

Pocket$ $traight
04-08-2010, 12:35 AM
I have said it before, I would take TO for a one year deal. Assuming that Mitchell isn't ready to start. I don't want to see any more slants to Moss although he tends to get more separation than Kelly.

The Goat
04-08-2010, 12:39 AM
TO seems far more mature than he did just a few years ago. If he and McNabb are chaps I wouldn't have any problem bringing him in.

Realistically I don't see Thomas and Kelly both having breakout seasons as starting wide-outs (Tana in the slot). Under Hixon's tutelage both guys' progression was slowed, and then of course Kelly has been so oft injured. Thomas is further along at this point so I'd like to see him start opposite a truly gifted WR. TO might as well be that guy.

SkinzWin
04-08-2010, 12:39 AM
After a 4-12 record, an assembled collection of older veterans already brought into the fold, I can't see it would hurt for a one year experiment. It's not like we have many draft picks anyway. The only thing I can think is it will improve us or at worst make us no worse off than we were last year. Give it a shot.

Kindoy
04-08-2010, 12:57 AM
no, too many egos on one team... more specifically on one side of the ball. don't get me wrong he still is a good player, but not a fit for us. he has matured some but as soon as he feels comfortable he's gonna start complaining. so personally no i don't want (as Skip Bayless would say) Team Obliterator.

CultBrennan59
04-08-2010, 01:32 AM
NFL Videos: McNabb from D.C. (http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/09000d5d81761050/McNabb-from-D-C)

Maybe this will hint for you about McNabb being with TO...its towards the end of the video

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum