Haynesworth back to the Titans?

Now you are taking this in a direction in which I did not go. All that I was saying is that the information we have is ambiguous, weak, and murky.

I never said you did. I said I agreed with what you said. Then I added my own interpretation.

Usually Schefter knows what he is talking about, but this is very hard to believe!

Adam_Schefter

Despite rampant speculation, Redskins NOT shopping Albert Haynesworth and haven't had any trade discussions regarding him since March 31.


When it comes to a Mike S. team, Schefter's insight is gospel.

This is very good news in my opinion.

Also, don't forget Jay Glazer. These 2 I believe.

Glazer is one of the best no doubt

Me too. I believe it.

Albert Haynesworth (http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=2636)


The media LOVES to dump on our team and Haynesworth because we spent to much for him. They'll make up anything to make us look bad.

I think it was money well spent...he made a huge difference on our defense. We needed sacks...he made them possible. Doubled our sack rate.

His performance doesn't merit being unloaded after one year. He did exactly what we expected.

So he had a spat with Zorn...many players did late in that debacle. He's gone now. Shanahan will keep him in check.

you guys and this sack thing crack me up. we got half of our sacks when ah didn't play against oakland.

I agree with those who say that Schefter is more reliable.

However, notice that this means that we haven't tried to trade AH for the last week. That's not a big deal. Tomorrow may be different.
well he was due his 21m on the 1st which is why they were more willing to ship him before then

well he was due his 21m on the 1st which is why they were more willing to ship him before then

Yes, you are correct. April 1 made a clear difference in his tradeability. But it is obvious from March that they don't see him as a "must keep" player, leaving the door open for maneuvering down the road. Maybe. Maybe not.