McNabb a REDSKIN!

Roughly equivalent, but Gradkowski has something called pocket presence to win out that battle. Campbell's special ability? Throw to the tight end.Educate yourself, please.

Bruce Gradkowski NFL & AFL Football Statistics | Pro-Football-Reference.com (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GradBr00.htm)

Trade value diminished according to the report below. I can't imagine us just releasing Campbell.

What does trade mean for Jason Campbell? - NFL Nation Blog - ESPN (http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/21129/what-does-trade-mean-for-jason-campbell)

I mean Locker is going to be the first off the board next year...we'd have to be pretty atrocious to get him...and I don't see us being THAT bad. That said, whoever said Luck has a promising potential knows his stuff...hei s THAT GOOD! Me personally...I'd rather take a shot at Barkley from USC two years from now...that would be a franchise QB...anyone disagree?

who knows man.. he got a lot of attention because he was a true freshman starting at USC, but he also earned the spot and had a pretty solid year.. a little up and down though

Did anyone else notice in the highlights of T.O's first game as an Eagle that Hicks congratulated him after the play?

Trade value diminished according to the report below. I can't imagine us just releasing Campbell.

What does trade mean for Jason Campbell? - NFL Nation Blog - ESPN (http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/21129/what-does-trade-mean-for-jason-campbell)
Yeah we've been talking about that

I seriously expected us to already have a trade partner, I guess it's possible that we have something going but who knows.. that'll be some shit if we end up just having to release him or whatever.. or make him the 2nd or 3rd QB

Why this trade isn't being met with the skepticism of bringing in an older declining vet, like early Snyder moves, is beyond my understanding. Was McNabb very good or excellent in his prime, yes, I know I hated watching him beat up on us in the early 2000's. But that's not the McNabb we are getting, and we gave up too much to get him. Again, the Warpath poll was 3 to 1 against bringing him here. Where are all the people who talk about the Eagles getting rid of a guy a year early, and how wise that is. Well we just received the guy they got rid of, and in a year (even assuming McNabb signs an extension which we have no obvious guarantee) we will be back with no QB, or a 35 yo with declining ability and one less pick, and no young qb to groom (like McCoy or Tebow reasonably could have been).

from that board:



Now THAT'S funny.

Hopefully Snyder can push a bounce pass rule through the competition committee.

Also funny.

Gtripp doesn't know how badly he's messing with himself. Campbell having to learn a new playbook? No problem for McNabb, who has plenty of experience in the Walsh O. Win for McNabb.
Campbell beating out McNabb short passing-wise? Uhhh, no.
O that requires the QB to throw on the run or extend that play? McNabb wins by a longshot. We know he has the instincts to make plays on the move.
Deep ball? McNabb
Age? Evened out by Campbell lack of experience.
Durability? When Fat Andy passes 50+ times a game, of course he's going to get his QB hurt eventually.I'll put the over/under on games played as a Redskin for McNabb at 11.5. You'll bite?

Seriously though, your analysis here is complete garbage. Try to offer something more substantial so I can respond to the argument as opposed to how sore you are being.

By the time this thread is finished Mcnabb will go from 33yo to 45.

By the time this thread is finished Mcnabb will go from 33yo to 45.
and gtripp's systolic bp from 133 to 145 lol