tryfuhl
04-04-2010, 10:35 PM
Not soon enough ;)
The 2010 Redskins aren't worse with McNabb than Campbell, but I mean, no evidence I can find suggests they are better (like, meaningfully so). And with that in mind, the only thing this does is takes a bold risk where perhaps a more conservative draft building approach would have sufficed.
I think McNabb is a better fit here than plenty of the alternatives, but the bottom line is that we're buying name recognition. The big move comes at No. 4, as this is insignificant to that.
Well yes, number 4 will impact us more in the long run most likely
who knows how we'd be in 11-13 with Campbell.. or if he'd be here
The 2010 Redskins aren't worse with McNabb than Campbell, but I mean, no evidence I can find suggests they are better (like, meaningfully so). And with that in mind, the only thing this does is takes a bold risk where perhaps a more conservative draft building approach would have sufficed.
I think McNabb is a better fit here than plenty of the alternatives, but the bottom line is that we're buying name recognition. The big move comes at No. 4, as this is insignificant to that.
Well yes, number 4 will impact us more in the long run most likely
who knows how we'd be in 11-13 with Campbell.. or if he'd be here