SOUL-SKINS
03-26-2010, 12:56 PM
This is just speculation at this point but very interesting. Obvisouly Brandon Marshall is the better option but he comes with a huge price tag. We will instantly have a true #1 receiver.........and then there is TO. I dunno. I think we would give up way to much for Marshall.
Redskins Insider - Shanahan interested in Terrell Owens or Brandon Marshall? (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/free-agency/shanahan-interested-in-terrell.html#more)
freddyg12
03-26-2010, 01:03 PM
IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!
Longtimefan
03-26-2010, 01:04 PM
Marshall would vastly improve the receiver corps and would be a good addition. He's tendered at one and I doubt we'd trade our number one for him. Depending on how bad they want him, something could be worked out.
I would say no to TO under any circumstance.
BigHairedAristocrat
03-26-2010, 01:07 PM
I dont want either, but if we had to have one of them, i'd actually prefer T.O. to my knowledge, he was pretty much a model citizen and buffalo and the general lack of interest in him around the league should be humbling. the chance to play the cowboys and eagles 4 times a year should be extra motivation for him. obviously, marshall is younger and has more long-term potential, but he's also just as much of a knucklehead as T.O. The advantage with T.O. is that he'd be cheaper and wouldnt cost us any draft picks.
Skinny Tee
03-26-2010, 01:28 PM
IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!
Id rather have TO.
He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.
KLHJ2
03-26-2010, 01:36 PM
I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.
I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.
doughtydoubter
03-26-2010, 01:39 PM
Id rather have TO.
He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.
good point
Zerohero
03-26-2010, 01:41 PM
As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles
Longtimefan
03-26-2010, 01:49 PM
I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.
I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.
We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.
steveo395
03-26-2010, 01:51 PM
Do not sign either of them. We are trying to build a team for the long term. T.O. is too old, but that is actually the least of his problems. We would have to give up too much to get Marshall and he has character problems too.
We need to build from the inside out. If we trade for Marshall, we will have no o-line, which is much more important. Plus, we need to give Thomas and Kelly a shot.