Brandon or T.O. ?

I would definately say Brandon Marshall. One, TO is way past his prime and a headache. Also, I went to UCF so I like Brandon Marshall.

T.O. sucks.

I have to say this is an extremely nice arguement. Fair and to the point.

I'd still take T.O. There is no draft pick required. I will say that I wouldn't mind Marshall if Denver would take one of our draft picks from next year. We are 2 short this year. No need to over do it.

I just want to know how on earth could anyone say no to taking an emotional person like this. He's obviously loves his teamates. We need some of this......:)

YouTube - Terrell Owens crying like a baby. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbHkJ2DQHqE)

Well they're no longer asking for more than a 3rd rounder (they haven't lately at least). I think others have mentioned it but it seems like Whitehurst has more "value" because of what he has the potential to accomplish. I think most execs feel like they've seen enough of Campbell to know what to expect from him.

Redskins and Broncos, to my knowledge, had very preliminary talks at the beginning of free agency about Marshall but nothing came out of that. Right now, no team is budging on giving up a 1st for Marshall. Redskins will wait and see if it gets to the point that the Broncos feel forced to get rid of Marshall, and the talk was that some package could involve Landry and Kelly.

Who knows for sure though

Smoot got to disagree. Whitehurst is grabidge

I don't have any real opinion of Whitehurst, I've seen enough of him to say...I have no real opinion of him.

Well they're no longer asking for more than a 3rd rounder (they haven't lately at least). I think others have mentioned it but it seems like Whitehurst has more "value" because of what he has the potential to accomplish. I think most execs feel like they've seen enough of Campbell to know what to expect from him.

Redskins and Broncos, to my knowledge, had very preliminary talks at the beginning of free agency about Marshall but nothing came out of that. Right now, no team is budging on giving up a 1st for Marshall. Redskins will wait and see if it gets to the point that the Broncos feel forced to get rid of Marshall, and the talk was that some package could involve Landry and Kelly.

Who knows for sure though

Ugh not Landry...I really think he can still be a good player with different coaching. He's one of the very few players on the roster i would rather not trade.

None of the above.

I'll take neither

but if I had to take one, I'd take Marshall. Younger, better hands, just wants to be paid, just what snyder can do for him. I would not give up my first rounder for him though, I'd only swap at best but I really don't want to do that either.

If you force me to pick then as sick as it makes me to say it I would rather have TO. I think Marshall would help them more on the field but TO will not cost them anything but money.

Terrell Owens wouldn't be a bad signing because he won't cost a mint in money and no compensation is required. The Redskins don't have the luxury of surrending draft picks for Marshall unless Denver is willing to trade him for say McIntosh and Kelly straight up.

Nada! Let them go elsewhere.